No evidence of spherical microplastics (10–300 μm) translocation in adult rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) after a two-week dietary exposure
Open accessAbstract
The consumption of fish contaminated with microplastics is often cited as a pathway for human exposure. However, because their guts are generally removed before consumption, exposure may be low compared to other routes such as shellfish, drinking water and dust. Still, microplastics have been found to translocate from the gut to other tissues, making exposure from eating fish fillets or other seafood products a potential concern. To better understand fish as an exposure route for microplastics in humans, we tested hypotheses about whether translocation occurs and if efficiency of translocation is dependent on particle size. We investigated the amount and distribution of fluorescent polyethylene microspheres (10-300 μm) in the gut, liver, fillets and gonads of adult rainbow trout after a two-week dietary exposure. Fish were fed food pellets dosed with up to ~9,800 microspheres per gram of food. Total exposures over the entire experiment ranged from ~80,000-850,000 microspheres per fish. We did not find any particles in the fillets, liver, or gonads of any fish, suggesting that translocation of spherical microplastics of this size range does not occur in adult rainbow trout. The quantity of microplastics found in the gut was also low or absent after a 24-hour depuration period, indicating effective excretion in this laboratory population. This research suggests that the consumption of fish fillets may not be a significant exposure pathway for microspheres >10 μm in size to contaminate humans. Future studies should test for different sizes, morphologies and species to further our understanding.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Gut retention time of microplastics in fish is reported to range from ∼1 to 6 d, based on laboratory experiments.
“Gut retention time, based on laboratory experiments that measured microplastics in feces and/or in animals sampled over time after dietary exposure, is reported to range from ∼1 to 6 d in fish.79–82”
From Microplastics and Anthropogenic Particles in Recreationally Caught Freshwater Fish from an Urbanized Region of the North American Great Lakes (2024) · cites this paper as [79]
The Results and discussion report microplastics remaining in six of ten exposed rainbow trout 24 hours after feeding, supporting retention at approximately one day. The paper sampled fish at that time point; it does not establish a gut-retention range extending to six days or measure retention over time. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 37 · Cited by 46
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Series EP. Biological Test Method: Acute Lethality Test Using Rainbow Trout. Facilities. 1990; 2:2.
- Cox KD, Covernton GA, Davies HL, Dower JF, Juanes F, Dudas SE. Human consumption of microplas- tics. Environmental science & technology. 2019 Jun 5; 53(12):7068-74.
- Authors
- Kim, J., Poirier, D. G., Helm, P. A., Bayoumi, M., & Rochman, C. M.
- Affiliations
- University of Toronto (CA)
- Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Kim, Joel
- Venue
- PLOS ONE
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2020-09-25
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- e0239128
- ISSN
- 1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3087804249
- Cited by
- 46
- References
- 37
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 1
- FWCI
- 1.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- Ministère de l’Environnement, de la Protection de la nature et des Parcs
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Microplastics and Plastic Pollution
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts
- Keywords
- microplastics, rainbow trout, dietary exposure, polyethylene microspheres, fish fillets, human dietary exposure, particle size, depuration, liver, gonads, seafood contamination
- MeSH terms
- Dietary Exposure, Microplastics, Animals, Animal Feed, Female, Food Contamination, Humans, Male, Microspheres, Particle Size, Water Pollutants, Chemical, Oncorhynchus mykiss, Seafood
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review