CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 26Insect symbiosis and bacterial influencesPhytoplasmas and Hemiptera pathogensInvertebrate Immune Response Mechanisms

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Dual proteomics of Drosophila melanogaster hemolymph infected with the heritable endosymbiont Spiroplasma poulsonii

Open access
Masson, Florent, Rommelaere, Samuel, Marra, Alice, Schüpfer, Fanny, Lemaitre, Bruno·2021·PLOS ONE
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0250524PMC PMC8084229

Published version of a preprint

Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Insects are frequently infected with heritable bacterial endosymbionts. Endosymbionts have a dramatic impact on their host physiology and evolution. Their tissue distribution is variable with some species being housed intracellularly, some extracellularly and some having a mixed lifestyle. The impact of extracellular endosymbionts on the biofluids they colonize ( e . g . insect hemolymph) is however difficult to appreciate because biofluid composition can depend on the contribution of numerous tissues. Here we investigate Drosophila hemolymph proteome changes in response to the infection with the endosymbiont Spiroplasma poulsonii . S . poulsonii inhabits the fly hemolymph and gets vertically transmitted over generations by hijacking the oogenesis in females. Using dual proteomics on infected hemolymph, we uncovered a weak, chronic activation of the Toll immune pathway by S . poulsonii that was previously undetected by transcriptomics-based approaches. Using Drosophila genetics, we also identified candidate proteins putatively involved in controlling S . poulsonii growth. Last, we also provide a deep proteome of S . poulsonii , which, in combination with previously published transcriptomics data, improves our understanding of the post-transcriptional regulations operating in this bacterium.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0250524

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 62

  1. AE Douglas, 2015, Multiorganismal Insects: Diversity and Function of Resident Microorganisms, Annu Rev Entomol, 60, 17, 10.1146/annurev-ento-010814-020822 · DOI
  2. AE Douglas, 2016, How multi-partner endosymbioses function, Nat Rev Microbiol, 14, 731, 10.1038/nrmicro.2016.151 · DOI
  3. L Teixeira, 2008, The bacterial symbiont Wolbachia induces resistance to RNA viral infections in Drosophila melanogaster, PLoS Biol, 6, e2, 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000002 · DOI
  4. LM Hedges, 2008, Wolbachia and virus protection in insects, Science (80-), 322, 702, 10.1126/science.1162418 · DOI
  5. KM Oliver, 2003, Facultative bacterial symbionts in aphids confer resistance to parasitic wasps, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 100, 1803, 10.1073/pnas.0335320100 · DOI
  6. CL Scarborough, 2005, Aphid protected from pathogen by endosymbiont, Science (80-), 310, 1781, 10.1126/science.1120180 · DOI
  7. CB Montllor, 2002, Facultative bacterial endosymbionts benefit pea aphids Acyrthosiphon pisum under heat stress, Ecol Entomol, 27, 189, 10.1046/j.1365-2311.2002.00393.x · DOI
  8. P Medina, 2019, Deep data mining reveals variable abundance and distribution of microbial reproductive manipulators within and among diverse host species, bioRxiv, 679837
  9. O Duron, 2008, The diversity of reproductive parasites among arthropods: Wolbachia do not walk alone, BMC Biol, 6, 27, 10.1186/1741-7007-6-27 · DOI
  10. JH Werren, 2008, Wolbachia: master manipulators of invertebrate biology, Nat Rev Microbiol, 6, 741, 10.1038/nrmicro1969 · DOI
  11. AA Hoffmann, 2011, Successful establishment of Wolbachia in Aedes populations to suppress dengue transmission, Nature, 476, 454, 10.1038/nature10356 · DOI
  12. F Masson, 2020, Growing Ungrowable Bacteria: Overview and Perspectives on Insect Symbiont Culturability, Microbiol Mol Biol Rev, 84, e00089, 10.1128/MMBR.00089-20 · DOI
  13. GE Gasparich, 2002, Spiroplasmas: evolution, adaptation and diversity, Front Biosci, 7, 619
  14. TS Haselkorn, 2010, The Spiroplasma heritable bacterial endosymbiont of Drosophila, Fly (Austin), 4, 80, 10.4161/fly.4.1.10883 · DOI
  15. M Mateos, 2006, Heritable Endosymbionts of Drosophila, Genetics, 174, 363, 10.1534/genetics.106.058818 · DOI
  16. JK Herren, 2014, Insect endosymbiont proliferation is limited by lipid availability, Elife, 3, e02964, 10.7554/eLife.02964 · DOI
  17. JK Herren, 2013, Vertical Transmission of a Drosophila Endosymbiont Via Cooption of the Yolk Transport and Internalization Machinery, MBio, 4, e00532, 10.1128/mBio.00532-12 · DOI
  18. T Harumoto, 2018, Male-killing toxin in a bacterial symbiont of Drosophila, Nature. Springer US, 557, 252
  19. J Xie, 2014, Male killing Spiroplasma protects Drosophila melanogaster against two parasitoid wasps, Heredity, 112, 399, 10.1038/hdy.2013.118 · DOI
  20. MJ Ballinger, 2017, Generality of toxins in defensive symbiosis: Ribosome-inactivating proteins and defense against parasitic wasps in Drosophila, PLoS Pathog, 13, e1006431, 10.1371/journal.ppat.1006431 · DOI
  21. J Jaenike, 2010, Adaptation via symbiosis: recent spread of a Drosophila defensive symbiont, Science, 329, 212, 10.1126/science.1188235 · DOI
  22. PT Hamilton, 2016, A ribosome-inactivating protein in a Drosophila defensive symbiont, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 113, 350, 10.1073/pnas.1518648113 · DOI
  23. F Masson, 2018, In Vitro Culture of the Insect Endosymbiont Spiroplasma poulsonii Highlights Bacterial Genes Involved in Host-Symbiont Interaction, MBio, 9, e00024, 10.1128/mBio.00024-18 · DOI
  24. F Masson, 2020, Transformation of the Drosophila sex-manipulative endosymbiont Spiroplasma poulsonii and persisting hurdles for functional genetics studies, Appl Environ Microbiol
  25. Z Veneti, 2005, A Functional Dosage Compensation Complex Required for Male Killing in Drosophila, Science, 307, 1461, 10.1126/science.1107182 · DOI
  26. T Harumoto, 2014, Male-killing Spiroplasma induces sex-specific cell death via host apoptotic pathway, PLoS Pathog, 10, e1003956, 10.1371/journal.ppat.1003956 · DOI
  27. T Harumoto, 2016, Male-killing symbiont damages host’s dosage-compensated sex chromosome to induce embryonic apoptosis, Nat Commun. Nature Publishing Group, 7, 12781, 10.1038/ncomms12781 · DOI
  28. T Harumoto, 2018, Common and unique strategies of male killing evolved in two distinct Drosophila symbionts, Proc R Soc B Biol Sci, 285
  29. JC Paredes, 2016, The Role of Lipid Competition for Endosymbiont-Mediated Protection against Parasitoid Wasps in Drosophila, MBio, 7, e01006, 10.1128/mBio.01006-16 · DOI
  30. JC Paredes, 2015, Genome sequence of the Drosophila melanogaster male-killing Spiroplasma strain MSRO endosymbiont, MBio, 6, e02437, 10.1128/mBio.02437-14 · DOI
  31. JK Herren, 2011, Spiroplasma and host immunity: Activation of humoral immune responses increases endosymbiont load and susceptibility to certain Gram-negative bacterial pathogens in Drosophila melanogaster, Cell Microbiol, 13, 1385, 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2011.01627.x · DOI
  32. F Masson, 2020, Blind killing of both male and female Drosophila embryos by a natural variant of the endosymbiotic bacterium Spiroplasma poulsonii, Cell Microbiol. John Wiley & Sons, 22, e13156
  33. VJ Palombella, 1994, The ubiquitin-proteasome pathway is required for processing the NF-kappa B1 precursor protein and the activation of NF-kappa B, Cell. United States, 78, 773
  34. GDD Hurst, 2003, Hidden from the host: Spiroplasma bacteria infecting Drosophila do not cause an immune response, but are suppressed by ectopic immune activation, Insect Mol Biol, 12, 93, 10.1046/j.1365-2583.2003.00380.x · DOI
  35. E De Gregorio, 2001, Genome-wide analysis of the Drosophila immune response by using oligonucleotide microarrays, Proc Nat Acad Sci, 98, 12590, 10.1073/pnas.221458698 · DOI
  36. K Troha, 2018, Comparative transcriptomics reveals CrebA as a novel regulator of infection tolerance in D. melanogaster, PLoS Pathog, 14, e1006847, 10.1371/journal.ppat.1006847 · DOI
  37. P Tzou, 2002, Constitutive expression of a single antimicrobial peptide can restore wild-type resistance to infection in immunodeficient Drosophila mutants, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 99, 2152, 10.1073/pnas.042411999 · DOI
  38. MA Hanson, 2019, Synergy and remarkable specificity of antimicrobial peptides in vivo using a systematic knockout approach, Elife, 8, e44341, 10.7554/eLife.44341 · DOI
  39. B Lemaitre, 2007, The host defense of Drosophila melanogaster, Annu Rev Immunol, 25, 697, 10.1146/annurev.immunol.25.022106.141615 · DOI
  40. HA MacMillan, 2016, Cold acclimation wholly reorganizes the Drosophila melanogaster transcriptome and metabolome, Sci Rep, 6, 28999, 10.1038/srep28999 · DOI
  41. M Telonis-Scott, 2013, New Levels of Transcriptome Complexity at Upper Thermal Limits in Wild Drosophila Revealed by Exon Expression Analysis, Genetics, 195, 809, 10.1534/genetics.113.156224 · DOI
  42. N Issa, 2018, The Circulating Protease Persephone Is an Immune Sensor for Microbial Proteolytic Activities Upstream of the Drosophila Toll Pathway, Mol Cell. Cell Press, 69, 539, 10.1016/j.molcel.2018.01.029 · DOI
  43. M Gottar, 2006, Dual detection of fungal infections in Drosophila via recognition of glucans and sensing of virulence factors, Cell, 127, 1425, 10.1016/j.cell.2006.10.046 · DOI
  44. G Kleiger, 2014, Perilous journey: a tour of the ubiquitin-proteasome system, Trends Cell Biol, 24, 352, 10.1016/j.tcb.2013.12.003 · DOI
  45. SU Sixt, 2008, Extracellular, circulating proteasomes and ubiquitin—Incidence and relevance, Biochim Biophys Acta—Mol Basis Dis, 1782, 817, 10.1016/j.bbadis.2008.06.005 · DOI
  46. A Heddi, 2005, Molecular and cellular profiles of insect bacteriocytes: mutualism and harm at the initial evolutionary step of symbiogenesis, Cell Microbiol, 7, 293, 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2004.00461.x · DOI
  47. AM Fallon, 2009, Proteasome activity in a naïve mosquito cell line infected with Wolbachia pipientis wAlbB, In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim, 45, 460, 10.1007/s11626-009-9193-6 · DOI
  48. PM White, 2017, Reliance of Wolbachia on High Rates of Host Proteolysis Revealed by a Genome-Wide RNAi Screen of Drosophila Cells, Genetics, 205, 1473, 10.1534/genetics.116.198903 · DOI
  49. Z He, 2019, How do Wolbachia modify the Drosophila ovary? New evidences support the “titration-restitution” model for the mechanisms of Wolbachia-induced CI, BMC Genomics, 20, 608, 10.1186/s12864-019-5977-6 · DOI
  50. AS Guidolin, 2018, Spiroplasma affects host aphid proteomics feeding on two nutritional resources, Sci Rep, 8, 2466, 10.1038/s41598-018-20497-9 · DOI
  51. S Haider, 2013, Integrated analysis of transcriptomic and proteomic data, Curr Genomics, 14, 91, 10.2174/1389202911314020003 · DOI
  52. AH Bingham, 1986, Mutations that reduce expression from the P2 promoter of the Escherichia coli galactose operon, Gene, 41, 67, 10.1016/0378-1119(86)90268-4 · DOI
  53. G Lithwick, 2003, Hierarchy of sequence-dependent features associated with prokaryotic translation, Genome Res, 13, 2665, 10.1101/gr.1485203 · DOI
  54. N Killiny, 2005, Spiroplasma citri Spiralin acts in vitro as a lectin binding to glycoproteins from its insect vector Circulifer haematoceps, Phytopathology, 95, 541, 10.1094/PHYTO-95-0541 · DOI
  55. S Duret, 2003, Spiralin is not essential for helicity, motility, or pathogenicity but is required for efficient transmission of Spiroplasma citri by its leafhopper vector Circulifer haematoceps, Appl Environ Microbiol, 69, 6225, 10.1128/AEM.69.10.6225-6234.2003 · DOI
  56. JE Pool, 2006, Finding of male-killing Spiroplasma infecting Drosophila melanogaster in Africa implies transatlantic migration of this endosymbiont, Heredity, 97, 27, 10.1038/sj.hdy.6800830 · DOI
  57. N a. Broderick, 2014, Microbiota-induced changes in Drosophila melanogaster host gene expression and gut morphology, MBio, 5, 1, 10.1128/mBio.01117-14 · DOI
  58. JR Wiśniewski, 2009, Universal sample preparation method for proteome analysis, Nat Methods, 6, 359, 10.1038/nmeth.1322 · DOI · Paper page
  59. J Rappsilber, 2007, Protocol for micro-purification, enrichment, pre-fractionation and storage of peptides for proteomics using StageTips, Nat Protoc, 2, 1896, 10.1038/nprot.2007.261 · DOI · Paper page
  60. J Cox, 2008, MaxQuant enables high peptide identification rates, individualized p.p.b.-range mass accuracies and proteome-wide protein quantification, Nat Biotechnol, 26, 1367, 10.1038/nbt.1511 · DOI · Paper page
  61. Y Romeo, 2008, Drosophila immunity: methods for monitoring the activity of Toll and Imd signaling pathways, Methods Mol Biol. United States, 415, 379
  62. MW Pfaffl, 2001, A new mathematical model for relative quantification in real-time RT-PCR, Nucleic Acids Res, 29, 10.1093/nar/29.9.e45 · DOI · Paper page

Metadata

Authors
Masson, F., Rommelaere, S., Marra, A., Schüpfer, F., & Lemaitre, B.
Affiliations
École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (CH)
ORCID
Venue
PLOS ONE
Publisher
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Published
2021-04-29
Volume
16
Issue
4
Pages
e0250524
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1371/journal.pone.0250524
PMC
PMC8084229
OpenAlex
W3157407611
Cited by
26
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2
FWCI
2.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (310030_185295)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Insect Science › Insect symbiosis and bacterial influences
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Phytoplasmas and Hemiptera pathogens
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Invertebrate Immune Response Mechanisms
Keywords
Drosophila melanogaster, hemolymph proteome, endosymbiotic bacteria, host immune response, vertical transmission, post-transcriptional regulation, host-symbiont interactions
MeSH terms
Animals, Bacterial Proteins, Drosophila melanogaster, Female, Hemolymph, Oogenesis, Spiroplasma, Symbiosis, Signal Transduction, Proteome, Proteomics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review