Simultaneous prediction of antibody backbone and side-chain conformations with deep learning
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Antibody engineering is becoming increasingly popular in medicine for the development of diagnostics and immunotherapies. Antibody function relies largely on the recognition and binding of antigenic epitopes via the loops in the complementarity determining regions. Hence, accurate high-resolution modeling of these loops is essential for effective antibody engineering and design. Deep learning methods have previously been shown to effectively predict antibody backbone structures described as a set of inter-residue distances and orientations. However, antigen binding is also dependent on the specific conformations of surface side-chains. To address this shortcoming, we created DeepSCAb: a deep learning method that predicts inter-residue geometries as well as side-chain dihedrals of the antibody variable fragment. The network requires only sequence as input, rendering it particularly useful for antibodies without any known backbone conformations. Rotamer predictions use an interpretable self-attention layer, which learns to identify structurally conserved anchor positions across several species. We evaluate the performance of the model for discriminating near-native structures from sets of decoys and find that DeepSCAb outperforms similar methods lacking side-chain context. When compared to alternative rotamer repacking methods, which require an input backbone structure, DeepSCAb predicts side-chain conformations competitively. Our findings suggest that DeepSCAb improves antibody structure prediction with accurate side-chain modeling and is adaptable to applications in docking of antibody-antigen complexes and design of new therapeutic antibody sequences.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764 · see citing works
Kovaltsuk, A., Leem, J., Kelm, S., Snowden, J., Deane, C. M., & Krawczyk, K. (2018) · The Journal of Immunology · doi:10.4049/jimmunol.1800708 · Cited by 247 · see citing works
RosettaAntibodyDesign (RAbD): a general framework for computational antibody design
Adolf-Bryfogle, J., Kalyuzhniy, O., Kubitz, M., Weitzner, B. D., Hu, X., Adachi, Y., Schief, W. R., & Dunbrack, R. L. (2018) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006112 · Cited by 227 · see citing works
Antibody structure prediction using interpretable deep learning
Ruffolo, J. A., Sulam, J., & Gray, J. J. (2022) · Patterns · doi:10.1016/j.patter.2021.100406 · Cited by 216 · see citing works
Self-citationAntibody side chain conformations are position-dependent
Leem, J., Georges, G., Shi, J., & Deane, C. M. (2018) · Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.25453 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
- Authors
- Akpinaroglu, D., Ruffolo, J. A., Mahajan, S. P., & Gray, J. J.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Merced (US)
- Johns Hopkins University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Gray, Jeffrey J.
- Venue
- PLOS ONE
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2022-06-15
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- e0258173
- ISSN
- 1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC9200299
- OpenAlex
- W4282970464
- Cited by
- 21
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1
- FWCI
- 1.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (T32-GM008403, R01-GM078221, R01-GM127578, R35-GM141881)
- National Science Foundation (DBI-1659649)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › vaccines and immunoinformatics approaches
- Keywords
- antibody structure prediction, side-chain conformation, hypervariable region, self-attention, anchor position, antibody-antigen docking, therapeutic antibody design, antibody engineering
- MeSH terms
- Deep Learning, Antigen-Antibody Complex, Protein Conformation, Structural Homology, Protein
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review