Cited by 26Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchAntibiotic Use and ResistanceGut microbiota and health

Association of midlife antibiotic use with subsequent cognitive function in women

Open access
Mehta, Raaj S., Lochhead, Paul, Wang, Yiqing, Ma, Wenjie, Nguyen, Long H., Kochar, Bharati, Huttenhower, Curtis, Grodstein, Francine +1 more·2022·PLoS ONE

Abstract

The gut microbiome is increasingly recognized to play a role in cognition and dementia. Antibiotic use impacts the gut microbiome and has been linked with chronic disease. Despite these data, there is no evidence supporting an association between long-term antibiotic use in adults and cognitive function. We conducted a prospective population-based cohort study among 14,542 participants in the Nurses' Health Study II who completed a self-administered computerized neuropsychological test battery between 2014-2018. Multivariate linear regression models were used to assess if chronic antibiotic use in midlife was associated with cognitive impairment assessed later in life. Women who reported at least 2 months of antibiotic exposure in midlife (mean age 54.7, SD 4.6) had lower mean cognitive scores seven years later, after adjustment for age and educational attainment of the spouse and parent, with a mean difference of -0.11 standard units for the global composite score (Ptrend <0.0001), -0.13 for a composite score of psychomotor speed and attention (Ptrend <0.0001), and -0.10 for a composite score of learning and working memory (Ptrend <0.0001) compared with non-antibiotic users. These differences were not materially changed after multivariate adjustment for additional risk factors, including comorbid conditions. As a benchmark, the mean difference in score associated with each additional year of age was (-0.03) for global cognition, (-0.04) for psychomotor speed and attention, and (-0.03) for learning and working memory; thus the relation of antibiotic use to cognition was roughly equivalent to that found for three to four years of aging. Long-term antibiotic use in midlife is associated with small decreases in cognition assessed seven years later. These data underscore the importance of antibiotic stewardship, especially among aging populations.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0264649

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The microbiota-gut-brain axis has multiple sites for off-target activity, which may lead to positive or negative neurocognitive effects downstream.

    “Certainly, the MGB axis has multiple sites for off-target activity, which may lead to positive or negative neurocognitive effects downstream, emphasizing the importance of antibiotic stewardship (404–407).”
  • In a large prospective cohort of 14,542 participants, chronic antibiotic use in midlife was associated with cognitive impairment later in life, such that antibiotic use was associated with an additional three years of aging compared to those with no antibiotic exposure.

    “In a large prospective cohort of 14,542 participants, chronic antibiotic use in midlife was associated with cognitive impairment later in life, such that antibiotic use was associated with an additional three years of aging, compared to those with no antibiotic exposure (407).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 34 · Cited by 26

Authors
Mehta, R. S., Lochhead, P., Wang, Y., Ma, W., Nguyen, L. H., Kochar, B., Huttenhower, C., Grodstein, F., & Chan, A. T.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Rush University Medical Center (US)
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Chan, Andrew T.
Venue
PLoS ONE
Published
2022-03-23
Volume
17
Issue
3
Pages
e0264649
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4220703526
Cited by
26
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5
FWCI
3.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. National Institutes of Health (U01 CA176726; K23 DK125838; U01 AG062682; RF1 AG067744)
  • Stuart and Suzanne Steele MGH Research Scholar Award
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology › Antibiotic Use and Resistance
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
Keywords
antibiotic use, midlife, cognitive function, cognitive impairment, gut microbiota, women, psychomotor speed, attention, working memory, learning, aging, antibiotic stewardship, Nurses' Health Study II
MeSH terms
Adult, Anti-Bacterial Agents, Child, Preschool, Cognition, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Neuropsychological Tests, Prospective Studies, Cohort Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review