Association of midlife antibiotic use with subsequent cognitive function in women
Open accessAbstract
The gut microbiome is increasingly recognized to play a role in cognition and dementia. Antibiotic use impacts the gut microbiome and has been linked with chronic disease. Despite these data, there is no evidence supporting an association between long-term antibiotic use in adults and cognitive function. We conducted a prospective population-based cohort study among 14,542 participants in the Nurses' Health Study II who completed a self-administered computerized neuropsychological test battery between 2014-2018. Multivariate linear regression models were used to assess if chronic antibiotic use in midlife was associated with cognitive impairment assessed later in life. Women who reported at least 2 months of antibiotic exposure in midlife (mean age 54.7, SD 4.6) had lower mean cognitive scores seven years later, after adjustment for age and educational attainment of the spouse and parent, with a mean difference of -0.11 standard units for the global composite score (Ptrend <0.0001), -0.13 for a composite score of psychomotor speed and attention (Ptrend <0.0001), and -0.10 for a composite score of learning and working memory (Ptrend <0.0001) compared with non-antibiotic users. These differences were not materially changed after multivariate adjustment for additional risk factors, including comorbid conditions. As a benchmark, the mean difference in score associated with each additional year of age was (-0.03) for global cognition, (-0.04) for psychomotor speed and attention, and (-0.03) for learning and working memory; thus the relation of antibiotic use to cognition was roughly equivalent to that found for three to four years of aging. Long-term antibiotic use in midlife is associated with small decreases in cognition assessed seven years later. These data underscore the importance of antibiotic stewardship, especially among aging populations.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The microbiota-gut-brain axis has multiple sites for off-target activity, which may lead to positive or negative neurocognitive effects downstream.
“Certainly, the MGB axis has multiple sites for off-target activity, which may lead to positive or negative neurocognitive effects downstream, emphasizing the importance of antibiotic stewardship (404–407).”
From Signalling cognition: The gut microbiota and hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis (2023) · cites this paper as [407]
In a large prospective cohort of 14,542 participants, chronic antibiotic use in midlife was associated with cognitive impairment later in life, such that antibiotic use was associated with an additional three years of aging compared to those with no antibiotic exposure.
“In a large prospective cohort of 14,542 participants, chronic antibiotic use in midlife was associated with cognitive impairment later in life, such that antibiotic use was associated with an additional three years of aging, compared to those with no antibiotic exposure (407).”
From Signalling cognition: The gut microbiota and hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis (2023) · cites this paper as [407]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 34 · Cited by 26
- Authors
- Mehta, R. S., Lochhead, P., Wang, Y., Ma, W., Nguyen, L. H., Kochar, B., Huttenhower, C., Grodstein, F., & Chan, A. T.
- Affiliations
- Harvard University (US)
- Rush University Medical Center (US)
- Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
- Corresponding author
- Chan, Andrew T.
- ORCID
- Venue
- PLoS ONE
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2022-03-23
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- e0264649
- ISSN
- 1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC8942267
- OpenAlex
- W4220703526
- Cited by
- 26
- References
- 34
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5
- FWCI
- 3.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- U.S. National Institutes of Health (U01 CA176726; K23 DK125838; U01 AG062682; RF1 AG067744)
- Stuart and Suzanne Steele MGH Research Scholar Award
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology › Antibiotic Use and Resistance
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
- Keywords
- antibiotic use, midlife, cognitive function, cognitive impairment, gut microbiota, women, psychomotor speed, attention, working memory, learning, aging, antibiotic stewardship, Nurses' Health Study II
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Anti-Bacterial Agents, Child, Preschool, Cognition, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Neuropsychological Tests, Prospective Studies, Cohort Studies
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review