Cited by 6Cellular Mechanics and InteractionsSlime Mold and Myxomycetes ResearchMicrotubule and mitosis dynamics

A role for myosin II clusters and membrane energy in cortex rupture for Dictyostelium discoideum

Open access
Asante-Asamani, Emmanuel, Grange, Daniel, Rawal, Devarshi, Santiago, Zully, Loustau, John, Brazill, Derrick·2022·PLOS ONE

Abstract

Blebs, pressure driven protrusions of the cell membrane, facilitate the movement of eukaryotic cells such as the soil amoeba Dictyostelium discoideum , white blood cells and cancer cells. Blebs initiate when the cell membrane separates from the underlying cortex. A local rupture of the cortex, has been suggested as a mechanism by which blebs are initiated. However, much clarity is still needed about how cells inherently regulate rupture of the cortex in locations where blebs are expected to form. In this work, we examine the role of membrane energy and the motor protein myosin II (myosin) in facilitating the cell driven rupture of the cortex. We perform under-agarose chemotaxis experiments, using Dictyostelium discoideum cells, to visualize the dynamics of myosin and calculate changes in membrane energy in the blebbing region. To facilitate a rapid detection of blebs and analysis of the energy and myosin distribution at the cell front, we introduce an autonomous bleb detection algorithm that takes in discrete cell boundaries and returns the coordinate location of blebs with its shape characteristics. We are able to identify by microscopy naturally occurring gaps in the cortex prior to membrane detachment at sites of bleb nucleation. These gaps form at positions calculated to have high membrane energy, and are associated with areas of myosin enrichment. Myosin is also shown to accumulate in the cortex prior to bleb initiation and just before the complete disassembly of the cortex. Together our findings provide direct spatial and temporal evidence to support cortex rupture as an intrinsic bleb initiation mechanism and suggests that myosin clusters are associated with regions of high membrane energy where its contractile activity leads to a rupture of the cortex at points of maximal energy.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0265380

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 46

  1. [1]Charras G, Paluch E. Blebs lead the way: how to migrate without lamellipodia. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2008; 9: 730– 736. doi: 10.1038/nrm2453 18628785 · DOI
  2. [2]Fackler OT, Grosse R. Cell motility through plasma membrane blebbing. J CELL BIOL. 208; 181(6): 879– 884. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200802081 PMC2426937 18541702 · DOI
  3. [3]Friedl P, Wolf K. Tumour-Cell invasion and migration: diversity and escape mechanisms. Nat Rev Cancer. 2003; 3: 362– 374. doi: 10.1038/nrc1075 12724734 · DOI
  4. [4]Sahai E, Marshall CJ. Differing modes of tumour cell invasion have distinct requirements for Rho/ROCK signalling and extracellular proteolysis. Nat Cell Biol. 2003; 5(8): 711– 719. doi: 10.1038/ncb1019 12844144 · DOI
  5. [5]Blanchoin L, Boujemaa-Paterski R, Sykes C, Plastino J. Actin dynamics, architecture, and mechanics in cell motility. PHYSIOL REV. 2014; 94(1): 235– 263. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00018.2013 24382887 · DOI
  6. [6]Even-Ram S, Yamada KM. Cell migration in 3D matrix. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2005; 17(5): 524– 532. doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2005.08.015 16112853 · DOI
  7. [7]Sahai E. Mechanisms of cancer cell invasion. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2005; 15: 87– 96. doi: 10.1016/j.gde.2004.12.002 15661538 · DOI
  8. [8]Wolf K, Mazo I, Leung H, Engelke K, Von Andrian UH, Deryugina EI, et al. Compensation mechanism in tumor cell migration: mesenchymal–amoeboid transition after blocking of pericellular proteolysis. J Cell BIOL. 2003; 160(2): 267– 277. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200209006 12527751 PMC2172637 · DOI
  9. [9]Blaser H, Reichman-Fried M, Castanon I, Dumstrei K, Marlow FL, Kawakami K, et al. Migration of zebrafish primordial germ cells: a role for myosin contraction and cytoplasmic flow. Dev Cell. 2006; 11(5): 613– 627. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2006.09.023 17084355 · DOI
  10. [10]Zatulovskiy E, Tyson R, Bretschneider T, Kay RR. Bleb-driven chemotaxis of Dictyostelium cells. J Cell Biol. 2014; 204(6): 1027– 1044. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201306147 24616222 PMC3998804 · DOI
  11. [11]Ibo M, Srivastava V, Robinson DN, Gagnon ZR. Cell blebbing in confined microfluidic environments. PLoS One. 2016; 11(10): e0163866. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0163866 27706201 PMC5051935 · DOI
  12. [12]Cunningham CC. Actin polymerization and intracellular solvent flow in cell surface blebbing. J Cell Biol. 1995; 129(6): 1589– 1599. doi: 10.1083/jcb.129.6.1589 7790356 PMC2291187 · DOI
  13. [13]Yoshida K, Soldati T. Dissection of amoeboid movement into two mechanically distinct modes. J Cell Sci. 2006; 119(18): 3833– 3844. doi: 10.1242/jcs.03152 16926192 · DOI
  14. [14]Langridge PD, Kay RR. Blebbing of Dictyostelium cells in response to chemoattractant. Exp Cell Res. 2006; 312(11): 2009– 2017. doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2006.03.007 16624291 · DOI
  15. [15]Woolley TE, Gaffney EA, Goriely A. Random blebbing motion: A simple model linking cell structural properties to migration characteristics. Phys Rev E. 2017; 96(1): 012409. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.96.012409 29347096 · DOI
  16. [16]Tyson RA, Zatulovskiy E, Kay RR, Bretschneider T. How blebs and pseudopods cooperate during chemotaxis. PNAS. 2014; 111(32): 11703– 11708. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1322291111 25074921 PMC4136620 · DOI
  17. [17]Manakova K, Yan H, Lowengrub J, Allard J. Cell surface mechanochemistry and the determinants of bleb formation, healing, and travel velocity. Biophys J. 2016; 110(7): 1636– 1647. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2016.03.008 27074688 PMC4833840 · DOI
  18. [18]Collier S, Paschke P, Kay RR, Bretschneider T. Image based modeling of bleb site selection. Sci Rep. 2017; 7(1): 1– 10. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-06875-9 28751725 PMC5532237 · DOI
  19. [19]Charras GT, Coughlin M, Mitchison TJ, Mahadevan L. Life and times of a cellular bleb. Biophy J. 2008; 94(5): 1836– 1853. doi: 10.1529/biophysj.107.113605 17921219 PMC2242777 · DOI
  20. [20]Charras GT, Hu CK, Coughlin M, Mitchison TJ. Reassembly of contractile actin cortex in cell blebs. J Cell Biol. 2006; 175(3): 477– 490. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200602085 17088428 PMC2064524 · DOI
  21. [21]Woolley TE, Gaffney EA, Oliver JM, Waters SL, Baker RE, Goriely A. Global contraction or local growth, bleb shape depends on more than just cell structure. J Theor Biol. 2015; 380: 83– 97. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2015.04.023 25934350 · DOI
  22. [22]Tinevez JY, Schulze U, Salbreux G, Roensch J, Joanny JF, Paluch E. Role of cortical tension in bleb growth. PNAS. 2009; 106(44): 18581– 18586. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0903353106 19846787 PMC2765453 · DOI
  23. [23]Strychalski W, Guy RD. Intracellular pressure dynamics in blebbing cells. Biophys J. 2016; 110(5): 1168– 1179. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2016.01.012 26958893 PMC4788720 · DOI
  24. [24]Strychalski W, Copos CA, Lewis OL, Guy RD. A poroelastic immersed boundary method with applications to cell biology. J Comput Phys. 2015; 282: 77– 97. doi: 10.1016/j.jcp.2014.10.004 · DOI
  25. [25]Kessin RH. Dictyostelium: evolution, cell biology, and the development of multicellularity. 38. Cambridge University Press; 2001.
  26. [26]Charras GT, Yarrow JC, Horton MA, Mahadevan L, Mitchison T. Non-equilibration of hydrostatic pressure in blebbing cells. Nature. 2005; 435(7040): 365– 369. doi: 10.1038/nature03550 15902261 PMC1564437 · DOI
  27. [27]Keller H, Eggli P. Protrusive activity, cytoplasmic compartmentalization, and restriction rings in locomoting blebbing Walker carcinosarcoma cells are related to detachment of cortical actin from the plasma membrane. Cell motil Cytoskeleton. 1998; 41(2): 181– 193. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0169(1998)41:2<181::AID-CM8>3.0.CO;2-H 9786092 · DOI
  28. [28]Paluch E, Piel M, Prost J, Bornens M, Sykes C. Cortical actomyosin breakage triggers shape oscillations in cells and cell fragments. Biophy J. 2005; 89(1): 724– 733. doi: 10.1529/biophysj.105.060590 15879479 PMC1366569 · DOI
  29. [29]Chikina AS, Svitkina TM, Alexandrova AY. Time-resolved ultrastructure of the cortical actin cytoskeleton in dynamic membrane blebs. J Cell Biol. 2019; 218(2): 445– 454. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201806075 30541746 PMC6363452 · DOI
  30. [30]Maugis B, Brugués J, Nassoy P, Guillen N, Sens P, Amblard F. Dynamic instability of the intracellular pressure driven bleb-based motility. J Cell Sci. 2004; 16: 3884– 3892. 20980385
  31. [31]Alert R, Casademunt J, Brugués J, Sens P. Model for probing membrane-cortex adhesion by micropipette aspiration and fluctuation spectroscopy. Biophys J. 2015; 108(8): 1878– 1886. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2015.02.027 25902428 PMC4407260 · DOI
  32. [32]Alert R, Casademunt J. Bleb nucleation through membrane peeling. Phys Rev Lett. 2016; 116(6): 068101. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.068101 26919015 · DOI
  33. [33]Santiago Z, Loustau J, Meretzky D, Rawal D, Brazill D. Advances in geometric techniques for analyzing blebbing in chemotaxing Dictyostelium cells. PloS One. 2019; 14(2): e0211975. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0211975 30763409 PMC6375592 · DOI
  34. [34]Lim FY, Chiam KH, Mahadevan L. The size, shape, and dynamics of cellular blebs. Europhys Lett. 2012; 100(2): 28004. doi: 10.1209/0295-5075/100/28004 · DOI
  35. [35]Kass M, Witkin A, Terzopoulos D. Snakes: Active contour models. Int J Comput Vis. 1988; 1(4): 321– 331. doi: 10.1007/BF00133570 · DOI
  36. [37]Helfrich W. Elastic properties of lipid bilayers: theory and possible experiments. Zeitschrift für Naturforschung c. 1973; 28(11-12): 693– 703. doi: 10.1515/znc-1973-11-1209 4273690 · DOI
  37. [38]Smith AS, Nowak RB, Zhou S, Giannetto M, Gokhin DS, Papoin J, et al. Myosin IIA interacts with the spectrin-actin membrane skeleton to control red blood cell membrane curvature and deformability. PNAS. 2018; 115(19): E4377– E4385. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1718285115 29610350 PMC5948966 · DOI
  38. [39]Sitarska E, Diz-Muñoz A. Pay attention to membrane tension: mechanobiology of the cell surface. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2020; 66: 11– 18. doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2020.04.001 32416466 PMC7594640 · DOI
  39. [40]Dai J, Sheetz MP. Membrane Tether Formation from Blebbing Cells. Biophys J. 1999; 77(6): 3363– 3370. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(99)77168-7 10585959 PMC1300608 · DOI
  40. [41]Crevenna AH, Arciniega M, Dupont A, Mizuno N, Kowalska K, Lange OF, et al. Side-binding proteins modulate actin filament dynamics. elife. 2015; 4: e04599. doi: 10.7554/eLife.04599 25706231 PMC4375888 · DOI
  41. [42]Gardel M, Valentine M, Crocker JC, Bausch AR, Weitz D. Microrheology of entangled F-actin solutions. Phys Rev Lett. 2003; 91(15): 158302. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.158302 14611506 · DOI
  42. [43]Broedersz CP, Kasza KE, Jawerth LM, Münster S, Weitz DA, MacKintosh FC. Measurement of nonlinear rheology of cross-linked biopolymer gels. Soft Matter. 2010; 6(17): 4120– 4127. doi: 10.1039/c0sm00285b · DOI
  43. [44]Landau LD, Lifshitz EM. Fluid Mechanics. Elsevier; 1987.
  44. [45]Canny JF. A computational approach to edge detection. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 1986; 8: 679– 698. doi: 10.1109/TPAMI.1986.4767851 21869365 · DOI · Paper page
  45. [46]Loustau J. Elements of Numerical Analysis with Mathematica. World Scientific Press; 2017.
  46. [47]Tsujioka M, Uyeda TQP, Iwadate Y, Patel H, Shibata K, Yumoto T, et al. Actin-binding domains meediate the distinct distribution of two Dictyostelium Talins through different affinities to specific subsets of actin filaments during directed cell migration. PLoS One. 2019; p. 1– 22. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0214736 30946777 PMC6449030 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Asante-Asamani, E., Grange, D., Rawal, D., Santiago, Z., Loustau, J., & Brazill, D.
Affiliations
  • Clarkson University (US)
  • Hunter College (US)
  • Baruch College (US)
Corresponding author
Asante-Asamani, Emmanuel
Venue
PLOS ONE
Published
2022-04-25
Volume
17
Issue
4
Pages
e0265380
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4224442507
Cited by
6
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1
FWCI
0.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • CUNY Academic Works (City University of New York) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Directorate for Biological Sciences (1244162)
  • Research Foundation of The City University of New York (692710047)
  • National Center on Minority Health and Health Disparities (8 G12 MD007599)
  • National Institutes of Health (GM060665)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Cellular Mechanics and Interactions
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Slime Mold and Myxomycetes Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Microtubule and mitosis dynamics
Keywords
bleb formation, myosin II, membrane energy, Dictyostelium discoideum, chemotaxis, cortical contractility, cell motility
MeSH terms
Cytoskeletal Proteins, Dictyostelium, Humans, Myosins, Myosin Type II

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review