Cited by 11Genomics and Phylogenetic StudiesCoral and Marine Ecosystems StudiesMarine Invertebrate Physiology and Ecology

Transfer of knowledge from model organisms to evolutionarily distant non-model organisms: The coral Pocillopora damicornis membrane signaling receptome

Open access
Kumar, Lokender, Brenner, Nathanael, Sledzieski, Samuel, Olaosebikan, Monsurat, Roger, Liza M., Lynn-Goin, Matthew, Klein-Seetharaman, Roshan, Berger, Bonnie +7 more·2023·PLOS ONE

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

With the ease of gene sequencing and the technology available to study and manipulate non-model organisms, the extension of the methodological toolbox required to translate our understanding of model organisms to non-model organisms has become an urgent problem. For example, mining of large coral and their symbiont sequence data is a challenge, but also provides an opportunity for understanding functionality and evolution of these and other non-model organisms. Much more information than for any other eukaryotic species is available for humans, especially related to signal transduction and diseases. However, the coral cnidarian host and human have diverged over 700 million years ago and homologies between proteins in the two species are therefore often in the gray zone, or at least often undetectable with traditional BLAST searches. We introduce a two-stage approach to identifying putative coral homologues of human proteins. First, through remote homology detection using Hidden Markov Models, we identify candidate human homologues in the cnidarian genome. However, for many proteins, the human genome alone contains multiple family members with similar or even more divergence in sequence. In the second stage, therefore, we filter the remote homology results based on the functional and structural plausibility of each coral candidate, shortlisting the coral proteins likely to have conserved some of the functions of the human proteins. We demonstrate our approach with a pipeline for mapping membrane receptors in humans to membrane receptors in corals, with specific focus on the stony coral, P . damicornis . More than 1000 human membrane receptors mapped to 335 coral receptors, including 151 G protein coupled receptors (GPCRs). To validate specific sub-families, we chose opsin proteins, representative GPCRs that confer light sensitivity, and Toll-like receptors, representative non-GPCRs, which function in the immune response, and their ability to communicate with microorganisms. Through detailed structure-function analysis of their ligand-binding pockets and downstream signaling cascades, we selected those candidate remote homologues likely to carry out related functions in the corals. This pipeline may prove generally useful for other non-model organisms, such as to support the growing field of synthetic biology.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0270965

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Kumar, L., Brenner, N., Sledzieski, S., Olaosebikan, M., Roger, L. M., Lynn-Goin, M., Klein-Seetharaman, R., Berger, B., Putnam, H., Yang, J., Lewinski, N. A., Singh, R., Daniels, N. M., Cowen, L., & Klein-Seetharaman, J.
Affiliations
  • Colorado School of Mines (US)
  • MIT Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory (US)
  • Tufts University (US)
  • Virginia Commonwealth University (US)
  • Yale University (US)
  • University of Rhode Island (US)
  • University of Washington (US)
Venue
PLOS ONE
Published
2023-02-03
Volume
18
Issue
2
Pages
e0270965
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4319058224
Cited by
11
References
4
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2
FWCI
0.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Journal of Media Literacy Education (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • NIH (R35GM141861)
  • National Science Foundation Office of Advanced Cyberinfrastructure (1940169, 1939263, 1939699, 1939795, 1939249)
  • National Science Foundation Division of Computing and Communication Foundations (2029543)
  • National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship (1745302)
  • National Institute of Food and Agriculture (1017848)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Marine Invertebrate Physiology and Ecology
Keywords
Pocillopora damicornis, remote homology detection, hidden Markov models, G protein-coupled receptors, opsin, Toll-like receptors, membrane signaling, non-model organisms, binding pocket, signal transduction
MeSH terms
Animals, Humans, Signal Transduction, Genome, Models, Animal, Anthozoa, Receptors, G-Protein-Coupled

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review