Cited by 39Genomics and Rare DiseasesCystic Fibrosis Research AdvancesCancer Genomics and Diagnostics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Benchmarking AlphaMissense pathogenicity predictions against cystic fibrosis variants

Open access

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Variants in the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator gene ( CFTR ) result in cystic fibrosis–a lethal autosomal recessive disorder. Missense variants that alter a single amino acid in the CFTR protein are among the most common cystic fibrosis variants, yet tools for accurately predicting molecular consequences of missense variants have been limited to date. AlphaMissense (AM) is a new technology that predicts the pathogenicity of missense variants based on dual learned protein structure and evolutionary features. Here, we evaluated the ability of AM to predict the pathogenicity of CFTR missense variants. AM predicted a high pathogenicity for CFTR residues overall, resulting in a high false positive rate and fair classification performance on CF variants from the CFTR2.org database. AM pathogenicity score correlated modestly with pathogenicity metrics from persons with CF including sweat chloride level, pancreatic insufficiency rate, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection rate. Correlation was also modest with CFTR trafficking and folding competency in vitro . By contrast, the AM score correlated well with CFTR channel function in vitro –demonstrating the dual structure and evolutionary training approach learns important functional information despite lacking such data during training. Different performance across metrics indicated AM may determine if polymorphisms in CFTR are recessive CF variants yet cannot differentiate mechanistic effects or the nature of pathophysiology. Finally, AM predictions offered limited utility to inform on the pharmacological response of CF variants i.e., theratype . Development of new approaches to differentiate the biochemical and pharmacological properties of CFTR variants is therefore still needed to refine the targeting of emerging precision CF therapeutics.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0297560

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 44

  1. MJ Welsh, 1993, Molecular mechanisms of CFTR chloride channel dysfunction in cystic fibrosis, Cell, 73, 1251, 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90353-R · DOI · Paper page
  2. JR Riordan, 1989, Identification of the Cystic Fibrosis Gene: Cloning and Characterization of Complementary DNA, Science, 245, 1066, 10.1126/science.2475911 · DOI · Paper page
  3. GR Cutting, 2015, Cystic fibrosis genetics: from molecular understanding to clinical application, Nat Rev Genet, 16, 45, 10.1038/nrg3849 · DOI
  4. EF McDonald, 2023, CFTR Folding: From Structure and Proteostasis to Cystic Fibrosis Personalized Medicine, ACS Chem Biol
  5. KE Oliver, 2017, Transformative therapies for rare CFTR missense alleles, Curr Opin Pharmacol, 34, 76, 10.1016/j.coph.2017.09.018 · DOI
  6. JP Clancy, 2019, CFTR modulator theratyping: Current status, gaps and future directions, J Cyst Fibros, 18, 22, 10.1016/j.jcf.2018.05.004 · DOI
  7. SV Molinski, 2015, Facilitating Structure-Function Studies of CFTR Modulator Sites with Efficiencies in Mutagenesis and Functional Screening, SLAS Discov, 20, 1204, 10.1177/1087057115605834 · DOI
  8. KE Oliver, 2023, The revolution of personalized pharmacotherapies for cystic fibrosis: what does the future hold?, Expert Opin Pharmacother, 24, 1545, 10.1080/14656566.2023.2230129 · DOI
  9. N Baatallah, 2021, Pharmacological chaperones improve intra-domain stability and inter-domain assembly via distinct binding sites to rescue misfolded CFTR, Cell Mol Life Sci, 78, 7813, 10.1007/s00018-021-03994-5 · DOI
  10. K Fiedorczuk, 2022, Mechanism of CFTR correction by type I folding correctors, Cell, 185, 158, 10.1016/j.cell.2021.12.009 · DOI
  11. K Fiedorczuk, 2022, Molecular structures reveal synergistic rescue of Δ508 CFTR by Trikafta modulators, Science, 378, 284, 10.1126/science.ade2216 · DOI
  12. C Wang, 2022, Mechanism of dual pharmacological correction and potentiation of human CFTR, Biophysics
  13. EF Kallam, 2023, Diagnostic challenges in CFTR-related metabolic syndrome: Where the guidelines fall short, Paediatr Respir Rev
  14. J Barben, 2021, Updated guidance on the management of children with cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator-related metabolic syndrome/cystic fibrosis screen positive, inconclusive diagnosis (CRMS/CFSPID), J Cyst Fibros, 20, 810, 10.1016/j.jcf.2020.11.006 · DOI
  15. KW Southern, 2019, Inconclusive diagnosis after a positive newborn bloodspot screening result for cystic fibrosis; clarification of the harmonised international definition, J Cyst Fibros, 18, 778, 10.1016/j.jcf.2019.04.010 · DOI
  16. J Cheng, 2023, Accurate proteome-wide missense variant effect prediction with AlphaMissense, Science
  17. EF McDonald, 2022, Structural Comparative Modeling of Multi-Domain F508del CFTR, Biomolecules, 12, 471, 10.3390/biom12030471 · DOI
  18. AG McKee, 2023, General trends in the effects of VX-661 and VX-445 on the plasma membrane expression of clinical, CFTR variants. Cell Chem Biol, 30, 632, 10.1016/j.chembiol.2023.05.001 · DOI
  19. F Liu, 2017, Molecular Structure of the Human CFTR Ion Channel, Cell, 169, 85, 10.1016/j.cell.2017.02.024 · DOI
  20. H Ashkenazy, 2016, ConSurf 2016: an improved methodology to estimate and visualize evolutionary conservation in macromolecules, Nucleic Acids Res, 44, W344, 10.1093/nar/gkw408 · DOI · Paper page
  21. AP Naren, 1999, CFTR Chloride Channel Regulation by an Interdomain Interaction, Science, 286, 544, 10.1126/science.286.5439.544 · DOI
  22. Z Bozoky, 2013, Regulatory R region of the CFTR chloride channel is a dynamic integrator of phospho-dependent intra- and intermolecular interactions, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 110, 10.1073/pnas.1315104110 · DOI
  23. Z Zhang, 2018, Molecular structure of the ATP-bound, phosphorylated human CFTR, Proc Natl Acad Sci, 115, 12757, 10.1073/pnas.1815287115 · DOI
  24. CM Farinha, 2017, From the endoplasmic reticulum to the plasma membrane: mechanisms of CFTR folding and trafficking, Cell Mol Life Sci, 74, 39, 10.1007/s00018-016-2387-7 · DOI
  25. A Jurkuvenaite, 2006, Mutations in the Amino Terminus of the Cystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance Regulator Enhance Endocytosis, J Biol Chem, 281, 3329, 10.1074/jbc.M508131200 · DOI
  26. H Bihler, 2023, In Vitro Modulator Responsiveness of 655 CFTR Variants Found in People With CF, Pharmacology and Toxicology
  27. J Clain, 2005, A neutral variant involved in a complex CFTR allele contributes to a severe cystic fibrosis phenotype, Hum Genet, 116, 454, 10.1007/s00439-004-1246-z · DOI
  28. F Liu, 2019, Structural identification of a hotspot on CFTR for potentiation, Science, 364, 1184, 10.1126/science.aaw7611 · DOI
  29. HI Yeh, 2019, Identifying the molecular target sites for CFTR potentiators GLPG1837 and VX-770, J Gen Physiol, 151, 912, 10.1085/jgp.201912360 · DOI
  30. S Koyano, 2010, A Rare Mutation in Cystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance Regulator Gene in a Recurrent Pancreatitis Patient Without Respiratory Symptoms, Pancreas, 39, 686, 10.1097/MPA.0b013e3181c65c2e · DOI
  31. A Hatton, 2022, Reclassifying inconclusive diagnosis after newborn screening for cystic fibrosis. Moving forward, J Cyst Fibros, 21, 448, 10.1016/j.jcf.2021.12.010 · DOI
  32. N Brandes, 2023, Genome-wide prediction of disease variant effects with a deep protein language model, Nat Genet, 55, 1512, 10.1038/s41588-023-01465-0 · DOI
  33. SV Molinski, 2018, Comprehensive mapping of cystic fibrosis mutations to CFTR protein identifies mutation clusters and molecular docking predicts corrector binding site, Proteins Struct Funct Bioinforma, 86, 833, 10.1002/prot.25496 · DOI
  34. G Campagna, 2022, Registro italiano Fibrosi Cistica (RIFC). Rapporto 2019–2020, Epidemiol Prev, 46, 1
  35. M Zampoli, 2021, Cystic fibrosis in South Africa: spectrum of disease and determinants of outcome, ERJ Open Res, 7, 00856, 10.1183/23120541.00856-2020 · DOI
  36. S Vaidyanathan, 2022, CFTR genotype analysis of Asians in international registries highlights disparities in the diagnosis and treatment of Asian patients with cystic fibrosis, Genet Med, 24, 2180, 10.1016/j.gim.2022.06.009 · DOI
  37. CT Jones, 1992, Three novel mutations in the cystic fibrosis gene detected by chemical cleavage: analysis of variant splicing and a nonsense mutation, Hum Mol Genet, 1, 11, 10.1093/hmg/1.1.11 · DOI
  38. F Anglès, 2022, Spatial covariance analysis reveals the residue-by-residue thermodynamic contribution of variation to the CFTR fold, Commun Biol, 5, 356, 10.1038/s42003-022-03302-2 · DOI
  39. JL Mendoza, 2012, Requirements for efficient correction of Δf508 CFTR revealed by analyses of evolved sequences, Cell, 148, 164, 10.1016/j.cell.2011.11.023 · DOI · Paper page
  40. WM Rabeh, 2012, Correction of Both NBD1 Energetics and Domain Interface Is Required to Restore ΔF508 CFTR Folding and Function, Cell, 148, 150, 10.1016/j.cell.2011.11.024 · DOI · Paper page
  41. I Protasevich, 2010, Thermal unfolding studies show the disease causing F508del mutation in CFTR thermodynamically destabilizes nucleotide-binding domain 1, Protein Sci, 19, 1917, 10.1002/pro.479 · DOI
  42. L He, 2010, Restoration of domain folding and interdomain assembly by second‐site suppressors of the ΔF508 mutation in CFTR, FASEB J, 24, 3103, 10.1096/fj.09-141788 · DOI
  43. GM Denning, 1992, Processing of mutant cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator is temperature-sensitive, Nature, 358, 761, 10.1038/358761a0 · DOI
  44. EF McDonald, 2022, Distinct proteostasis states drive pharmacologic chaperone susceptibility for cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator misfolding mutants. Miller E, editor, Mol Biol Cell, 33, 10.1091/mbc.E21-11-0578 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
McDonald, E. F., Oliver, K. E., Schlebach, J. P., Meiler, J., & Plate, L.
Affiliations
  • Vanderbilt University (US)
  • Emory University (US)
  • Purdue University West Lafayette (US)
Corresponding author
  • Meiler, Jens
  • Plate, Lars
Venue
PLOS ONE
Published
2024-01-25
Volume
19
Issue
1
Pages
e0297560
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4391216271
Cited by
39
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 13
FWCI
10.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R35 GM133552, T32 GM065086)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R01 HL167046, R00 HL151965, F31 HL162483)
  • Cystic Fibrosis Foundation (OLIVER22A0-KB)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genomics and Rare Diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Cystic Fibrosis Research Advances
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
Keywords
AlphaMissense, cystic fibrosis, CFTR, missense mutations, pathogenicity prediction, sweat chloride, pancreatic insufficiency, Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection, CFTR trafficking, precision medicine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review