Cited by 3Protein Structure and DynamicsBiochemical and Structural CharacterizationEnzyme Structure and Function

Two different and robustly modeled DNA binding modes of Competence Protein ComP - systematic modeling with AlphaFold 3, RoseTTAFold2NA, Chai-1 and re-docking in HADDOCK

Open access
Helsem, Stian Aleksander, Alfsnes, Kristian, Frye, Stephan A., Hesselberg Løvestad, Alexander, Ambur, Ole Herman·2025·PLOS One

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

The competence protein ComP is a Type IV minor pilin and the extracellular DNA binding protein involved in natural transformation in the human pathogens Neisseria gonorrhoeae , Neisseria meningitidis, Eikenella corrodens and related Neisseriaceae bacteria. Details of the DNA binding mode of ComP is enigmatic, and the 3D structure of the DNA:: protein complex remains unresolved. Here we characterize the ComP orthologs in a set of Neisseriaceae family members, model their common structural domains and their interaction with different preferred 12 base pair long DNA binding motifs, DNA Uptake Sequences (DUS) and scrambled versions of these. Through systematic in silico modeling using AlphaFold 3, RoseTTAFold2NA, and Chai-1 and model comparisons, we bring a new understanding of the interactions between DNA and ComP. We report six distinct binding modes of which two, here named Epsilon and Gamma, were robustly modeled across platforms and different ComPs. The characteristics and robustness of the predicted models and DNA binding modes from each tool are assessed and discussed. This work expands the knowledge on the ComP:: DUS interaction and guides further wet- and dry-lab systematic and experimental characterization of these complexes through which molecular and clinical interventions may be developed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0315160

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Helsem, S. A., Alfsnes, K., Frye, S. A., Hesselberg Løvestad, A., & Ambur, O. H.
Affiliations
  • OsloMet – Oslo Metropolitan University (NO)
  • Norwegian Institute of Public Health (NO)
  • Oslo University Hospital (NO)
Corresponding author
Ambur, Ole Herman
Venue
PLOS One
Published
2025-05-08
Volume
20
Issue
5
Pages
e0315160
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4410204749
Cited by
3
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2
FWCI
0.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Faculty of Health Sciences, OsloMet
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Biochemical and Structural Characterization
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Enzyme Structure and Function
Keywords
DNA binding modes, natural transformation, Neisseriaceae, protein-DNA complex, protein structure prediction, AlphaFold3, Chai-1, model robustness, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, Neisseria meningitidis, Eikenella corrodens
MeSH terms
Bacterial Proteins, Binding Sites, DNA, DNA-Binding Proteins, Humans, Models, Molecular, Protein Binding, Fimbriae Proteins, Molecular Docking Simulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review