Cited by 92Prion Diseases and Protein MisfoldingNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration MechanismsAlzheimer's disease research and treatments

Prion Strain Differences in Accumulation of PrPSc on Neurons and Glia Are Associated with Similar Expression Profiles of Neuroinflammatory Genes: Comparison of Three Prion Strains

Open access
Carroll, James A., Striebel, James F., Rangel, Alejandra, Woods, Tyson, Phillips, Katie, Peterson, Karin E., Race, Brent, Chesebro, Bruce·2016·PLOS Pathogens

Abstract

Misfolding and aggregation of host proteins are important features of the pathogenesis of neurodegenerative diseases including Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, frontotemporal dementia and prion diseases. In all these diseases, the misfolded protein increases in amount by a mechanism involving seeded polymerization. In prion diseases, host prion protein is misfolded to form a pathogenic protease-resistant form, PrPSc, which accumulates in neurons, astroglia and microglia in the CNS. Here using dual-staining immunohistochemistry, we compared the cell specificity of PrPSc accumulation at early preclinical times post-infection using three mouse scrapie strains that differ in brain regional pathology. PrPSc from each strain had a different pattern of cell specificity. Strain 22L was mainly associated with astroglia, whereas strain ME7 was mainly associated with neurons and neuropil. In thalamus and cortex, strain RML was similar to 22L, but in substantia nigra, RML was similar to ME7. Expression of 90 genes involved in neuroinflammation was studied quantitatively using mRNA from thalamus at preclinical times. Surprisingly, despite the cellular differences in PrPSc accumulation, the pattern of upregulated genes was similar for all three strains, and the small differences observed correlated with variations in the early disease tempo. Gene upregulation correlated with activation of both astroglia and microglia detected in early disease prior to vacuolar pathology or clinical signs. Interestingly, the profile of upregulated genes in scrapie differed markedly from that seen in two acute viral CNS diseases (LaCrosse virus and BE polytropic Friend retrovirus) that had reactive gliosis at levels similar to our prion-infected mice.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.ppat.1005551

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In three different prion strains (RML, 22L, ME7) that produce different patterns of PrPSc deposition, highly similar expression patterns in neuroinflammatory genes and glia response genes are measured.

    “This is in line with further research using three different prion strains, RML, 22L, and ME7 which produce different patterns of PrPSc deposition. Despite these obvious differences, highly similar expression patterns in neuroinflammatory genes and glia response genes were measured in all three mouse models [75].”

    From Loss of Homeostatic Microglia Signature in Prion Diseases (2022) · cites this paper as [75]

  • GFAP is highly upregulated in astrocytes upon disease.

    “GFAP is highly upregulated in astrocytes upon disease [73,75,107].”

    From Loss of Homeostatic Microglia Signature in Prion Diseases (2022) · cites this paper as [75]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 73 · Cited by 92

Authors
Carroll, J. A., Striebel, J. F., Rangel, A., Woods, T., Phillips, K., Peterson, K. E., Race, B., & Chesebro, B.
Affiliations
National Institutes of Health (US)
Corresponding author
Chesebro, Bruce
Venue
PLOS Pathogens
Published
2016-04-05
Volume
12
Issue
4
Pages
e1005551
ISSN
  • 1553-7366 (ISSN-L)
  • 1553-7374
OpenAlex
W2337252009
Cited by
92
References
73
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 9
FWCI
4.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS Pathogens (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases
  • NHLBI Division of Intramural Research
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Prion Diseases and Protein Misfolding
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
Keywords
prion strains, prion protein accumulation, PrPSc, scrapie, neuroinflammation, astroglia, microglia, reactive gliosis, gene expression profiling, thalamus, substantia nigra, La Crosse virus, neurodegeneration, seeded polymerization
MeSH terms
Animals, Immunohistochemistry, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Neuroglia, Neurons, Scrapie, Immunoblotting, PrPSc Proteins, Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review