The origin, deployment, and evolution of a plant-parasitic nematode effectorome
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Plant-parasitic nematodes constrain global food security. During parasitism, they secrete effectors into the host plant from two types of pharyngeal gland cells. These effectors elicit profound changes in host biology to suppress immunity and establish a unique feeding organ from which the nematode draws nutrition. Despite the importance of effectors in nematode parasitism, there has been no comprehensive identification and characterisation of the effector repertoire of any plant-parasitic nematode. To address this, we advance techniques for gland cell isolation and transcriptional analysis to define a stringent annotation of putative effectors for the cyst nematode Heterodera schachtii at three key life-stages. We define 717 effector gene loci: 269 “known” high-confidence homologs of plant-parasitic nematode effectors, and 448 “novel” effectors with high gland cell expression. In doing so we define the most comprehensive “effectorome” of a plant-parasitic nematode to date. Using this effector definition, we provide the first systems-level understanding of the origin, deployment and evolution of a plant-parasitic nematode effectorome. The robust identification of the effector repertoire of a plant-parasitic nematode will underpin our understanding of nematode pathology, and hence, inform strategies for crop protection.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764 · see citing works
ColabFold - Making protein folding accessible to all
Mirdita, M., Schütze, K., Moriwaki, Y., Heo, L., Ovchinnikov, S., & Steinegger, M. (2021) · doi:10.1101/2021.08.15.456425 · Cited by 9,391 · see citing works
Evolutionary-scale prediction of atomic level protein structure with a language model
Lin, Z., Akin, H., Rao, R., Hie, B., Zhu, Z., Lu, W., Smetanin, N., Verkuil, R., Kabeli, O., Shmueli, Y., et al. (2022) · doi:10.1101/2022.07.20.500902 · Cited by 5,523 · see citing works
Fast and accurate protein structure search with Foldseek
van Kempen, M., Kim, S. S., Tumescheit, C., Mirdita, M., Lee, J., Gilchrist, C. L. M., Söding, J., & Steinegger, M. (2022) · doi:10.1101/2022.02.07.479398 · Cited by 2,598 · see citing works
Fast and accurate protein structure search with Foldseek
van Kempen, M., Kim, S. S., Tumescheit, C., Mirdita, M., Lee, J., Gilchrist, C. L. M., Söding, J., & Steinegger, M. (2024) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/s41587-023-01773-0 · Cited by 2,596 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
- Authors
- Molloy, B., Shin, D. S., Long, J., Pellegrin, C., Senatori, B., Vieira, P., Thorpe, P. J., Damm, A., Ahmad, M., Vermeulen, K., Derevnina, L., Wei, S., Sperling, A., Reyes Estévez, E., Bruty, S., de Souza, V. H. M., Kranse, O. P., Maier, T., Baum, T., & Eves-van den Akker, S.
- Affiliations
- University of Cambridge (GB)
- Agricultural Research Service (US)
- University of Dundee (GB)
- Iowa State University (US)
- ORCID
- Venue
- PLOS Pathogens
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2024-07-29
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- e1012395
- ISSN
- 1553-7366 (ISSN-L)
- 1553-7374
- PMC
- PMC11309470
- OpenAlex
- W4401070623
- Cited by
- 32
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2026: 17 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 1
- FWCI
- 7.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Update notices
- new_version (2024-08-08)
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- PLoS Pathogens (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Apollo (University of Cambridge) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Discovery Research Portal (University of Dundee) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BB/R011311/1, BB/S006397/1, BB/X006352/1, BB/Y513246/1)
- Leverhulme Trust (RPG-2023-001)
- UK Research and Innovation (EP/X024008/1)
- Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/T022159/1)
- USDA-ARS National Programs 303 (8042-22000-322-000-D)
- Horizon 2020 Framework Programme (882941)
- British Society of Plant Pathology
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Nematode management and characterization studies
- Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Helminth infection and control
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Parasitism and Resistance
- Keywords
- plant-parasitic nematodes, Heterodera schachtii, cyst nematodes, effector evolution, host immune suppression, transcriptional analysis, life stages
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Host-Parasite Interactions, Nematoda, Plant Diseases, Plants, Tylenchoidea, Helminth Proteins
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review