Cited by 73Hormonal and reproductive studiesClinical Laboratory Practices and Quality ControlScientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation

Evaluation of a Candidate Reference Measurement Procedure for Serum Free Testosterone Based on Ultrafiltration and Isotope Dilution–Gas Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry

Open access
Van Uytfanghe, Katleen, Stöckl, Dietmar, Kaufman, Jean M, Fiers, Tom, Ross, H Alec, De Leenheer, André P, Thienpont, Linda M·2004·Clinical Chemistry

Abstract

Background: To assess the analytical validity of free testosterone (FTe) measurements, a reference measurement procedure (RMP) is required. For steroids, isotope dilution–mass spectrometry is accepted as state-of-the-art technology. Because FTe is defined as the hormone fraction in serum water in equilibrium with the protein-bound fraction, the RMP should include a physical separation step. The use of equilibrium dialysis (ED) or ultrafiltration (UF) is advocated. Our objective was to develop such a candidate RMP. Methods: We selected UF combined with isotope dilution–gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (ID-GC/MS) for direct measurement of Te in the ultrafiltrate. After optimization of the UF process, the complete procedure was validated by use of split-sample comparisons with indirect ED (iED) and symmetric dialysis (SyD). Results: The candidate RMP gave maximum within-day, between-day, and total CVs of 3.0%, 3.1%, and 4.3%. The Deming regression equations for the respective method comparisons were: UF-ID-GC/MS = 0.98(iED) − 53 pmol/L (r = 0.94; Sy|x= 42 pmol/L) and UF-ID-GC/MS = 0.92(SyD) + 21 pmol/L (r = 0.97; Sy|x= 31 pmol/L). Conclusions: We achieved the objective of a state-of-the-art candidate RMP, which agreed well with iED and SyD. However, we also demonstrated that a degree of discordance remains, which may require a decision from an authoritative organization on the recommended procedure to measure free hormone concentrations.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1373/clinchem.2004.037358

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 39 · Cited by 73

Authors
Van Uytfanghe, K., Stöckl, D., Kaufman, J. M., Fiers, T., Ross, H. A., De Leenheer, A. P., & Thienpont, L. M.
Affiliations
  • Laboratory for Analytical Chemistry and
  • Ghent University Hospital (BE)
  • Department of Chemical Endocrinology, University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
  • Laboratory for Medical Biochemistry and Clinical Analysis, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Ghent University, Gent, Belgium
Corresponding author
Thienpont, Linda M
Venue
Clinical Chemistry
Published
2004-11-01
Volume
50
Issue
11
Pages
2101-2110
ISSN
  • 0009-9147 (ISSN-L)
  • 1530-8561
OpenAlex
W2136883072
Cited by
73
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 3
FWCI
3.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Clinical Chemistry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Hormonal and reproductive studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Scientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation
Keywords
free testosterone, reference measurement procedure, ultrafiltration, isotope dilution, gas chromatography-mass spectrometry, equilibrium dialysis, method comparison, method validation, steroid hormone measurement
MeSH terms
Blood Proteins, Humans, Indicator Dilution Techniques, Male, Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry, Protein Binding, Reference Standards, Testosterone, Ultrafiltration, Reproducibility of Results

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review