Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 246

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Breast Cancer Diagnosis and Prognosis through Quantitative Measurements of Serum Glycan Profiles

Kyselova, Zuzana, Mechref, Yehia, Kang, Pilsoo, Goetz, John A, Dobrolecki, Lacey E, Sledge, George W, Schnaper, Lauren, Hickey, Robert J, Malkas, Linda H, Novotny, Milos V·2008·Clinical Chemistry

Abstract

Background: Glycosylated proteins play important roles in cell-to-cell interactions, immunosurveillance, and a variety of receptor-mediated and specific protein functions through a highly complex repertoire of glycan structures. Aberrant glycosylation has been implicated in cancer for many years. Methods: We performed specific MALDI mass spectrometry (MS)-based glycomic profile analyses of permethylated glycans in sera from breast cancer patients (12, stage I; 11, stage II; 9, stage III; and 50, stage IV) along with sera from 27 disease-free women. The serum glycoproteins were enzymatically deglycosylated, and the released glycans were purified and quantitatively permethylated before their MALDI-MS analyses. We applied various statistical analysis tools, including ANOVA and principal component analysis, to evaluate the MS profiles. Results: Two statistical procedures implicated several sialylated and fucosylated N-glycan structures as highly probable biomarkers. Quantitative changes according to a cancer stage resulted when we categorized the glycans according to molecular size, number of oligomer branches, and abundance of sugar residues. Increases in sialylation and fucosylation of glycan structures appeared to be indicative of cancer progression. Different statistical evaluations confirmed independently that changes in the relative intensities of 8 N-glycans are characteristic of breast cancer (P < 0.001), whereas other glycan structures might contribute additionally to distinctions in the statistically recognizable patterns (different stages). Conclusions: MS-based N-glycomic profiling of serum-derived constituents appears promising as a highly sensitive and informative approach for staging the progression of cancer.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1373/clinchem.2007.087148

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 246

Metadata

Authors
Kyselova, Z., Mechref, Y., Kang, P., Goetz, J. A., Dobrolecki, L. E., Sledge, G. W., Schnaper, L., Hickey, R. J., Malkas, L. H., & Novotny, M. V.
Venue
Clinical Chemistry
Published
2008-07-01
Volume
54
Issue
7
Pages
1166-1175
ISSN
  • 0009-9147 (ISSN-L)
  • 1530-8561
OpenAlex
W2096406024
Cited by
246
References
0
FWCI
7.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Breast Cancer Diagnosis and Prognosis through Quantitative Measurements of Serum Glycan Profiles. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1373/clinchem.2007.087148
The paper
Kyselova, Z., Mechref, Y., Kang, P., Goetz, J. A., Dobrolecki, L. E., Sledge, G. W., Schnaper, L., Hickey, R. J., Malkas, L. H., & Novotny, M. V. (2008). Breast Cancer Diagnosis and Prognosis through Quantitative Measurements of Serum Glycan Profiles. Clinical Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1373/clinchem.2007.087148

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.