The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Breast Cancer Diagnosis and Prognosis through Quantitative Measurements of Serum Glycan Profiles
Abstract
Background: Glycosylated proteins play important roles in cell-to-cell interactions, immunosurveillance, and a variety of receptor-mediated and specific protein functions through a highly complex repertoire of glycan structures. Aberrant glycosylation has been implicated in cancer for many years. Methods: We performed specific MALDI mass spectrometry (MS)-based glycomic profile analyses of permethylated glycans in sera from breast cancer patients (12, stage I; 11, stage II; 9, stage III; and 50, stage IV) along with sera from 27 disease-free women. The serum glycoproteins were enzymatically deglycosylated, and the released glycans were purified and quantitatively permethylated before their MALDI-MS analyses. We applied various statistical analysis tools, including ANOVA and principal component analysis, to evaluate the MS profiles. Results: Two statistical procedures implicated several sialylated and fucosylated N-glycan structures as highly probable biomarkers. Quantitative changes according to a cancer stage resulted when we categorized the glycans according to molecular size, number of oligomer branches, and abundance of sugar residues. Increases in sialylation and fucosylation of glycan structures appeared to be indicative of cancer progression. Different statistical evaluations confirmed independently that changes in the relative intensities of 8 N-glycans are characteristic of breast cancer (P < 0.001), whereas other glycan structures might contribute additionally to distinctions in the statistically recognizable patterns (different stages). Conclusions: MS-based N-glycomic profiling of serum-derived constituents appears promising as a highly sensitive and informative approach for staging the progression of cancer.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Cell surface protein glycosylation in cancer
Christiansen, M. N., Chik, J., Lee, L., Anugraham, M., Abrahams, J. L., & Packer, N. H. (2014) · PROTEOMICS · doi:10.1002/pmic.201300387 · Cited by 518
Mass spectrometry approaches to glycomic and glycoproteomic analyses
Ruhaak, L. R., Xu, G., Li, Q., Goonatilleke, E., & Lebrilla, C. B. (2018) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00732 · Cited by 395
High-Mannose Glycans are Elevated during Breast Cancer Progression
de Leoz, M. L. A., Young, L. J. T., An, H. J., Kronewitter, S. R., Kim, J., Miyamoto, S., Borowsky, A. D., Chew, H. K., & Lebrilla, C. B. (2011) · Molecular & Cellular Proteomics · doi:10.1074/mcp.m110.002717 · Cited by 320
Capillary electrophoresis–mass spectrometry for direct structural identification of serum N-glycans
Snyder, C. M., Zhou, X., Karty, J. A., Fonslow, B. R., Novotny, M. V., & Jacobson, S. C. (2017) · Journal of Chromatography A · doi:10.1016/j.chroma.2017.09.009 · Cited by 58
Metadata
- Authors
- Kyselova, Z., Mechref, Y., Kang, P., Goetz, J. A., Dobrolecki, L. E., Sledge, G. W., Schnaper, L., Hickey, R. J., Malkas, L. H., & Novotny, M. V.
- Venue
- Clinical Chemistry
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2008-07-01
- Volume
- 54
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1166-1175
- ISSN
- 0009-9147 (ISSN-L)
- 1530-8561
- OpenAlex
- W2096406024
- Cited by
- 246
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Breast Cancer Diagnosis and Prognosis through Quantitative Measurements of Serum Glycan Profiles. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1373/clinchem.2007.087148
- The paper
- Kyselova, Z., Mechref, Y., Kang, P., Goetz, J. A., Dobrolecki, L. E., Sledge, G. W., Schnaper, L., Hickey, R. J., Malkas, L. H., & Novotny, M. V. (2008). Breast Cancer Diagnosis and Prognosis through Quantitative Measurements of Serum Glycan Profiles. Clinical Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1373/clinchem.2007.087148
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.