The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Maternal Mosaicism Is a Significant Contributor to Discordant Sex Chromosomal Aneuploidies Associated with Noninvasive Prenatal Testing
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: In the human fetus, sex chromosome aneuploidies (SCAs) are as prevalent as the common autosomal trisomies 21, 18, and 13. Currently, most noninvasive prenatal tests (NIPTs) offer screening only for chromosomes 21, 18, and 13, because the sensitivity and specificity are markedly higher than for the sex chromosomes. Limited studies suggest that the reduced accuracy associated with detecting SCAs is due to confined placental, placental, or true fetal mosaicism. We hypothesized that an altered maternal karyotype may also be an important contributor to discordant SCA NIPT results. METHODS: We developed a rapid karyotyping method that uses massively parallel sequencing to measure the degree of chromosome mosaicism. The method was validated with DNA models mimicking XXX and XO mosaicism and then applied to maternal white blood cell (WBC) DNA from patients with discordant SCA NIPT results. RESULTS: Sequencing karyotyping detected chromosome X (ChrX) mosaicism as low as 5%, allowing an accurate assignment of the maternal X karyotype. In a prospective NIPT study, we showed that 16 (8.6%) of 181 positive SCAs were due to an abnormal maternal ChrX karyotype that masked the true contribution of the fetal ChrX DNA fraction. CONCLUSIONS: The accuracy of NIPT for ChrX and ChrY can be improved substantially by integrating the results of maternal-plasma sequencing with those for maternal-WBC sequencing. The relatively high frequency of maternal mosaicism warrants mandatory WBC testing in both shotgun sequencing– and single-nucleotide polymorphism–based clinical NIPT after the finding of a potential fetal SCA.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
on behalf of the European Society of Human Genetics (ESHG) and the American Society of Human Genetics (ASHG), Dondorp, W., de Wert, G., Bombard, Y., Bianchi, D. W., Bergmann, C., Borry, P., Chitty, L. S., Fellmann, F., Forzano, F., et al. (2015) · European Journal of Human Genetics · doi:10.1038/ejhg.2015.57 · Cited by 349
Sequencing of Circulating Cell-free DNA during Pregnancy
Bianchi, D. W., & Chiu, R. W. K. (2018) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmra1705345 · Cited by 313
Benn, P., Borrell, A., Chiu, R. W. K., Cuckle, H., Dugoff, L., Faas, B., Gross, S., Huang, T., Johnson, J., Maymon, R., et al. (2015) · Prenatal Diagnosis · doi:10.1002/pd.4608 · Cited by 292
Implications of fetoplacental mosaicism on cell-free DNA testing for sex chromosome aneuploidies
Grati, F. R., Bajaj, K., Zanatta, V., Malvestiti, F., Malvestiti, B., Marcato, L., Grimi, B., Maggi, F., Simoni, G., Gross, S. J., et al. (2017) · Prenatal Diagnosis · doi:10.1002/pd.5138 · Cited by 50
Thung, D. T., Beulen, L., Hehir-Kwa, J., & Faas, B. H. (2015) · Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics · doi:10.1586/14737159.2015.973857 · Cited by 20
Metadata
- Authors
- Wang, Y., Chen, Y., Tian, F., Zhang, J., Song, Z., Wu, Y., Han, X., Hu, W., Ma, D., Cram, D., & Cheng, W.
- Venue
- Clinical Chemistry
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2014-01-01
- Volume
- 60
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 251-259
- ISSN
- 0009-9147 (ISSN-L)
- 1530-8561
- OpenAlex
- W2057814045
- Cited by
- 315
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 27.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Maternal Mosaicism Is a Significant Contributor to Discordant Sex Chromosomal Aneuploidies Associated with Noninvasive Prenatal Testing. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1373/clinchem.2013.215145
- The paper
- Wang, Y., Chen, Y., Tian, F., Zhang, J., Song, Z., Wu, Y., Han, X., Hu, W., Ma, D., Cram, D., & Cheng, W. (2014). Maternal Mosaicism Is a Significant Contributor to Discordant Sex Chromosomal Aneuploidies Associated with Noninvasive Prenatal Testing. Clinical Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1373/clinchem.2013.215145
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.