The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
Analytical Bias Exceeding Desirable Quality Goal in 4 out of 5 Common Immunoassays: Results of a Native Single Serum Sample External Quality Assessment Program for Cobalamin, Folate, Ferritin, Thyroid-Stimulating Hormone, and Free T4 Analyses
Abstract
BACKGROUND: We undertook this study to evaluate method differences for 5 components analyzed by immunoassays, to explore whether the use of method-dependent reference intervals may compensate for method differences, and to investigate commutability of external quality assessment (EQA) materials. METHODS: Twenty fresh native single serum samples, a fresh native serum pool, Nordic Federation of Clinical Chemistry Reference Serum X (serum X) (serum pool), and 2 EQA materials were sent to 38 laboratories for measurement of cobalamin, folate, ferritin, free T4, and thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) by 5 different measurement procedures [Roche Cobas (n = 15), Roche Modular (n = 4), Abbott Architect (n = 8), Beckman Coulter Unicel (n = 2), and Siemens ADVIA Centaur (n = 9)]. The target value for each component was calculated based on the mean of method means or measured by a reference measurement procedure (free T4). Quality specifications were based on biological variation. Local reference intervals were reported from all laboratories. RESULTS: Method differences that exceeded acceptable bias were found for all components except folate. Free T4 differences from the uncommonly used reference measurement procedure were large. Reference intervals differed between measurement procedures but also within 1 measurement procedure. The serum X material was commutable for all components and measurement procedures, whereas the EQA materials were noncommutable in 13 of 50 occasions (5 components, 5 methods, 2 EQA materials). CONCLUSIONS: The bias between the measurement procedures was unacceptably large in 4/5 tested components. Traceability to reference materials as claimed by the manufacturers did not lead to acceptable harmonization. Adjustment of reference intervals in accordance with method differences and use of commutable EQA samples are not implemented commonly.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
State-of-the-art APS can be derived from evaluation and comparison of laboratory methods or from peer comparison data from proficiency testing programs.
“Alternatively, the state-of-the-art APS can be derived from the evaluation and comparison of laboratory methods99–104 or using peer comparison data from proficiency testing programs.105–107”
Citations
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 22 · Cited by 37
Metadata
- Authors
- Kristensen, G. B. B., Rustad, P., Berg, J. P., & Aakre, K. M.
- Affiliations
- The Norwegian Clinical Chemistry EQA program, Bergen, Norway
- Oslo University Hospital (NO)
- Haukeland University Hospital (NO)
- Corresponding author
- Kristensen, Gunn B B
- Venue
- Clinical Chemistry
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2016-09-01
- Volume
- 62
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1255-1263
- ISSN
- 0009-9147 (ISSN-L)
- 1530-8561
- OpenAlex
- W2470492368
- Cited by
- 37
- References
- 22
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 1
- FWCI
- 4.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model (vor)
- Locations
- Clinical Chemistry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Medical Laboratory Technology › Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Instrumentation › Scientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Reliability and Agreement in Measurement
- Keywords
- external quality assessment, commutability, reference values, vitamin B12, folic acid, ferritin, thyroid-stimulating hormone, free thyroxine, biological variation
- MeSH terms
- Ferritins, Folic Acid, Humans, Immunoassay, Quality Assurance, Health Care, Quality Control, Thyroid Function Tests, Thyrotropin, Vitamin B 12
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review