Cited by 82Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of LifeHealth Promotion and Cardiovascular PreventionDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins

A Nationwide Community-Based Lifestyle Program Could Delay Or Prevent Type 2 Diabetes Cases And Save $5.7 Billion In 25 Years

Zhuo, Xiaohui, Zhang, Ping, Gregg, Edward W., Barker, Lawrence, Hoerger, Thomas J., Tony Pearson-Clarke, Albright, Ann·2012·Health Affairs

Abstract

The increasing health and economic burden of diabetes has made preventing the disease a public health priority. But investing in such chronic disease prevention programs requires a long-term horizon because many years may be required for the downstream savings to fully offset the up-front intervention cost. Using a simulation model, we projected the costs and benefits of a nationwide community-based lifestyle intervention program for preventing type 2 diabetes. Accounting for all costs to the US health care system, our results indicate that the program would break even in fourteen years. Within twenty-five years, the program would prevent or delay about 885,000 cases of type 2 diabetes in the United States and produce savings of $5.7 billion nationwide. If restricted to people ages 65-84, the program would save $2.4 billion. Thus, implementing such a program nationwide would be an efficient use of health care resources, although it might be necessary for all health insurers to participate to share prevention costs. Our results also indicate that although a prevention program would lead to cost savings in both younger and older people, it would achieve greater health and economic gains if it were directed at people under age sixty-five.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1377/hlthaff.2011.1115

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 28 · Cited by 82

Authors
Zhuo, X., Zhang, P., Gregg, E. W., Barker, L., Hoerger, T. J., Pearson-Clarke, T., & Albright, A.
Affiliations
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US)
  • Ping Zhang is a senior health economist at the CDC.
  • Lawrence Barker is a senior scientist at the CDC.
  • RTI International (US)
  • Tony Pearson-Clarke is a health writer and editor at the CDC.
  • Ann Albright is director of the Division of Diabetes Translation, CDC.
Venue
Health Affairs
Published
2012-01
Volume
31
Issue
1
Pages
50-60
ISSN
  • 0278-2715 (ISSN-L)
  • 1544-5208
OpenAlex
W2067825523
Cited by
82
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 4
FWCI
17.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Health Affairs (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Health Promotion and Cardiovascular Prevention
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
Keywords
type 2 diabetes prevention, community-based lifestyle intervention, cost-benefit analysis, health care costs, cost-effectiveness, diabetes incidence, older adults, chronic disease prevention
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Female, Forecasting, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Models, Theoretical, United States, Cohort Studies, Cost Savings, Cost of Illness, Community Networks, Risk Reduction Behavior, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review