Physicians in nonprimary care and small practices and those age 55 and older lag in adopting electronic health record systems
Abstract
By 2011 more than half of all office-based physicians were using electronic health record systems, but only about one-third of those physicians had systems with basic features such as the abilities to record information on patient demographics, view laboratory and imaging results, maintain problem lists, compile clinical notes, or manage computerized prescription ordering. Basic features are considered important to realize the potential of these systems to improve health care. We found that although trends in adoption of electronic health record systems across geographic regions converged from 2002 through 2011, adoption continued to lag for non-primary care specialists, physicians age fifty-five and older, and physicians in small (1-2 providers) and physician-owned practices. Federal policies are specifically aimed at encouraging primary care providers and small practices to achieve widespread use of electronic health records. To achieve their nationwide adoption, federal policies may also have to focus on encouraging adoption among non-primary care specialists, as well as addressing persistent gaps in the use of electronic record systems by practice size, physician age, and ownership status.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
There is some evidence that primary care physicians are more likely to adopt EHR technology.
“There is some evidence that primary care physicians are more likely to adopt EHR technology.27,30”
From Clinician Adoption of an Artificial Intelligence Algorithm to Detect Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction in Primary Care. (2022) · cites this paper as [27]
Younger age is a characteristic of early adoption in the use of digital health tools.
“Several studies have suggested younger age as a characteristic of early adoption in the use of digital health tools.27,28”
From Clinician Adoption of an Artificial Intelligence Algorithm to Detect Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction in Primary Care. (2022) · cites this paper as [27]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 6 · Cited by 132
- Authors
- Decker, S. L., Jamoom, E. W., & Sisk, J. E.
- Affiliations
- National Center for Health Statistics (US)
- National Academy of Medicine (US)
- ORCID
- Decker, Sandra L.
- Venue
- Health Affairs
- Publisher
- Health Affairs Publishing, LLC
- Published
- 2012-05
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1108-1114
- ISSN
- 0278-2715 (ISSN-L)
- 1544-5208
- OpenAlex
- W2108167590
- Cited by
- 132
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 29.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Health Affairs (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Medical Coding and Health Information
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Healthcare Policy and Management
- Keywords
- electronic health records, technology adoption, small practices, physician age, physician-owned practices, practice size, health IT policy, primary care
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Age Factors, Diffusion of Innovation, Group Practice, Humans, Middle Aged, Physicians, United States, Health Care Surveys, Electronic Health Records
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review