Cited by 132Electronic Health Records SystemsMedical Coding and Health InformationHealthcare Policy and Management

Physicians in nonprimary care and small practices and those age 55 and older lag in adopting electronic health record systems

Decker, Sandra L., Jamoom, Eric W., Sisk, Jane E.·2012·Health Affairs

Abstract

By 2011 more than half of all office-based physicians were using electronic health record systems, but only about one-third of those physicians had systems with basic features such as the abilities to record information on patient demographics, view laboratory and imaging results, maintain problem lists, compile clinical notes, or manage computerized prescription ordering. Basic features are considered important to realize the potential of these systems to improve health care. We found that although trends in adoption of electronic health record systems across geographic regions converged from 2002 through 2011, adoption continued to lag for non-primary care specialists, physicians age fifty-five and older, and physicians in small (1-2 providers) and physician-owned practices. Federal policies are specifically aimed at encouraging primary care providers and small practices to achieve widespread use of electronic health records. To achieve their nationwide adoption, federal policies may also have to focus on encouraging adoption among non-primary care specialists, as well as addressing persistent gaps in the use of electronic record systems by practice size, physician age, and ownership status.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1377/hlthaff.2011.1121

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 6 · Cited by 132

Authors
Decker, S. L., Jamoom, E. W., & Sisk, J. E.
Affiliations
  • National Center for Health Statistics (US)
  • National Academy of Medicine (US)
Venue
Health Affairs
Published
2012-05
Volume
31
Issue
5
Pages
1108-1114
ISSN
  • 0278-2715 (ISSN-L)
  • 1544-5208
OpenAlex
W2108167590
Cited by
132
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 2
FWCI
29.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Health Affairs (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Medical Coding and Health Information
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Healthcare Policy and Management
Keywords
electronic health records, technology adoption, small practices, physician age, physician-owned practices, practice size, health IT policy, primary care
MeSH terms
Adult, Age Factors, Diffusion of Innovation, Group Practice, Humans, Middle Aged, Physicians, United States, Health Care Surveys, Electronic Health Records

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review