Despite The Spread Of Health Information Exchange, There Is Little Evidence Of Its Impact On Cost, Use, And Quality Of Care
Abstract
Health information exchange (HIE), which is the transfer of electronic information such as laboratory results, clinical summaries, and medication lists, is believed to boost efficiency, reduce health care costs, and improve outcomes for patients. Stimulated by federal financial incentives, about two-thirds of hospitals and almost half of physician practices are now engaged in some type of HIE with outside organizations. To determine how HIE has affected such health care measures as cost, service use, and quality, we identified twenty-seven scientific studies, extracted selected characteristics from each, and meta-analyzed these characteristics for trends. Overall, 57 percent of published analyses reported some benefit from HIE. However, articles employing study designs having strong internal validity, such as randomized controlled trials or quasi-experiments, were significantly less likely than others to associate HIE with benefits. Among six articles with strong internal validity, one study reported paradoxical negative effects, three studies found no effect, and two studies reported that HIE led to benefits. Furthermore, these two studies had narrower focuses than the others. Overall, little generalizable evidence currently exists regarding benefits attributable to HIE.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Community HIEs have positive effects on cost savings and care decisions.
“Community HIEs have a particular role in this process since positive effects on cost savings and care decisions have been associated with the community HIEs [10].”
From Evolution of clinical Health Information Exchanges to population health resources: a case study of the Indiana network for patient care (2025) · cites this paper as [10]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Blockchain Technology for Healthcare: Facilitating the Transition to Patient-Driven Interoperability
Gordon, W. J., & Catalini, C. (2018) · Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal · doi:10.1016/j.csbj.2018.06.003 · Cited by 828 · see citing works
Ji, H., Kim, S., Yi, S., Hwang, H., Kim, J.-W., & Yoo, S. (2020) · Journal of Biomedical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2020.103459 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Dixon, B. E., Zhang, Z., Arno, J. N., Revere, D., Joseph Gibson, P., & Grannis, S. J. (2020) · Public Health Reports® · doi:10.1177/0033354920914318 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Williams, K. S., Rahurkar, S., Grannis, S. J., Schleyer, T. K., & Dixon, B. E. (2025) · BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making · doi:10.1186/s12911-025-02933-9 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Rahurkar, S., Vest, J. R., & Menachemi, N.
- Affiliations
- University of Alabama at Birmingham (US)
- Weill Cornell Medicine (US)
- Indiana University Indianapolis (US)
- Venue
- Health Affairs
- Publisher
- Health Affairs Publishing, LLC
- Published
- 2015-03
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 477-483
- ISSN
- 0278-2715 (ISSN-L)
- 1544-5208
- OpenAlex
- W2075796489
- Cited by
- 133
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 9
- FWCI
- 39.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Health Affairs (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Healthcare Systems and Technology
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Healthcare Policy and Management
- Keywords
- health information exchange, electronic health records, health care costs, health care utilization, quality of care, internal validity, randomized controlled trials, evidence synthesis
- MeSH terms
- Cost-Benefit Analysis, Female, Humans, Male, Quality of Health Care, United States, Health Care Costs, Electronic Health Records, Health Information Systems, Health Information Exchange
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review