Cited by 133Electronic Health Records SystemsHealthcare Systems and TechnologyHealthcare Policy and Management

Despite The Spread Of Health Information Exchange, There Is Little Evidence Of Its Impact On Cost, Use, And Quality Of Care

Rahurkar, Saurabh, Vest, Joshua R., Menachemi, Nir·2015·Health Affairs

Abstract

Health information exchange (HIE), which is the transfer of electronic information such as laboratory results, clinical summaries, and medication lists, is believed to boost efficiency, reduce health care costs, and improve outcomes for patients. Stimulated by federal financial incentives, about two-thirds of hospitals and almost half of physician practices are now engaged in some type of HIE with outside organizations. To determine how HIE has affected such health care measures as cost, service use, and quality, we identified twenty-seven scientific studies, extracted selected characteristics from each, and meta-analyzed these characteristics for trends. Overall, 57 percent of published analyses reported some benefit from HIE. However, articles employing study designs having strong internal validity, such as randomized controlled trials or quasi-experiments, were significantly less likely than others to associate HIE with benefits. Among six articles with strong internal validity, one study reported paradoxical negative effects, three studies found no effect, and two studies reported that HIE led to benefits. Furthermore, these two studies had narrower focuses than the others. Overall, little generalizable evidence currently exists regarding benefits attributable to HIE.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1377/hlthaff.2014.0729

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rahurkar, S., Vest, J. R., & Menachemi, N.
Affiliations
  • University of Alabama at Birmingham (US)
  • Weill Cornell Medicine (US)
  • Indiana University Indianapolis (US)
Venue
Health Affairs
Published
2015-03
Volume
34
Issue
3
Pages
477-483
ISSN
  • 0278-2715 (ISSN-L)
  • 1544-5208
OpenAlex
W2075796489
Cited by
133
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 9
FWCI
39.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Health Affairs (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Healthcare Systems and Technology
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Healthcare Policy and Management
Keywords
health information exchange, electronic health records, health care costs, health care utilization, quality of care, internal validity, randomized controlled trials, evidence synthesis
MeSH terms
Cost-Benefit Analysis, Female, Humans, Male, Quality of Health Care, United States, Health Care Costs, Electronic Health Records, Health Information Systems, Health Information Exchange

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review