Cited by 248Food Security and Health in Diverse PopulationsDiabetes Management and EducationDiabetes Management and Research

A Pilot Food Bank Intervention Featuring Diabetes-Appropriate Food Improved Glycemic Control Among Clients In Three States

Seligman, Hilary K., Lyles, Courtney, Marshall, Michelle B., Prendergast, Kimberly, Smith, Morgan C., Headings, Amy, Bradshaw, Georgiana, Rosenmoss, Sophie +1 more·2015·Health Affairs

Abstract

Food insecurity--defined as not having adequate quantity and quality of food at all times for all household members to have an active, healthy life--is a risk factor for poor diabetes control, yet few diabetes interventions address this important factor. Food pantries, which receive food from food banks and distribute it to clients in need, may be ideal sites for diabetes self-management support because they can provide free diabetes-appropriate food to people in low-income communities. Between February 2012 and March 2014, we enrolled 687 food pantry clients with diabetes in three states in a six-month pilot intervention that provided them with diabetes-appropriate food, blood sugar monitoring, primary care referral, and self-management support. Improvements were seen in pre-post analyses of glycemic control (hemoglobin A1c decreased from 8.11 percent to 7.96 percent), fruit and vegetable intake (which increased from 2.8 to 3.1 servings per day), self-efficacy, and medication adherence. Among participants with elevated HbA1c (at least 7.5 percent) at baseline, HbA1c improved from 9.52 percent to 9.04 percent. Although food pantries are nontraditional settings for diabetes support, this pilot study suggests a promising health promotion model for vulnerable populations. Policies supporting such interventions may be particularly effective because of food pantries' food access and distribution capacity.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1377/hlthaff.2015.0641

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Restricting our review to health care-based studies also excluded potentially informative FI interventions that examine health outcomes but take place in non-health care settings.

    “Restricting our review to health care-based studies also excluded potentially informative FI interventions that examine health outcomes but take place in non-health care settings. 46,47”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Seligman, H. K., Lyles, C., Marshall, M. B., Prendergast, K., Smith, M. C., Headings, A., Bradshaw, G., Rosenmoss, S., & Waxman, E.
Affiliations
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
  • Feeding America (US)
  • Mid Ohio Foodbank (US)
  • Georgiana Bradshaw is a diabetes program coordinator at the Food Bank of Corpus Christi, in Texas.
  • Urban Institute (US)
Venue
Health Affairs
Published
2015-11
Volume
34
Issue
11
Pages
1956-1963
ISSN
  • 0278-2715 (ISSN-L)
  • 1544-5208
OpenAlex
W2183484947
Cited by
248
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 69 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 6
FWCI
25.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Health Affairs (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
Keywords
food banks, food pantries, diabetes mellitus, glycemic control, food insecurity, diabetes self-management support, HbA1c, blood glucose monitoring, fruit and vegetable intake, medication adherence, self-efficacy, low-income populations, primary care referral, health promotion
MeSH terms
Diet, Healthy, Blood Glucose, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Food Supply, Health Promotion, Humans, Pilot Projects, United States

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review