Cited by 52Healthcare Policy and ManagementHealthcare Systems and ReformsPharmaceutical Economics and Policy

Medicare Advantage Plans Pay Hospitals Less Than Traditional Medicare Pays

Baker, Laurence C., Bundorf, M. Kate, Devlin, Aileen M., Kessler, Daniel P.·2016·Health Affairs

Abstract

There is ongoing debate about how prices paid to providers by Medicare Advantage plans compare to prices paid by fee-for-service Medicare. We used data from Medicare and the Health Care Cost Institute to identify the prices paid for hospital services by fee-for-service (FFS) Medicare, Medicare Advantage plans, and commercial insurers in 2009 and 2012. We calculated the average price per admission, and its trend over time, in each of the three types of insurance for fixed baskets of hospital admissions across metropolitan areas. After accounting for differences in hospital networks, geographic areas, and case-mix between Medicare Advantage and FFS Medicare, we found that Medicare Advantage plans paid 5.6 percent less for hospital services than FFS Medicare did. Without taking into account the narrower networks of Medicare Advantage, the program paid 8.0 percent less than FFS Medicare. We also found that the rates paid by commercial plans were much higher than those of either Medicare Advantage or FFS Medicare, and growing. At least some of this difference comes from the much higher prices that commercial plans pay for profitable service lines.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1377/hlthaff.2015.1553

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Various payment incentives have been proposed and experimented with curbing the rising cost in the healthcare system to encourage healthcare providers to plan discreetly on resources, promoting risk-sharing between payers and providers.

    “Various payment incentives have been proposed and experimented with curbing the rising cost in the healthcare system to encourage healthcare providers to plan discreetly on resources17,18, promoting risk-sharing between payers and providers.”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 9 · Cited by 52

Authors
Baker, L. C., Bundorf, M. K., Devlin, A. M., & Kessler, D. P.
Affiliations
  • National Bureau of Economic Research (US)
  • Stanford University (US)
  • Hoover Institution (US)
Venue
Health Affairs
Published
2016-08
Volume
35
Issue
8
Pages
1444-1451
ISSN
  • 0278-2715 (ISSN-L)
  • 1544-5208
OpenAlex
W2476984903
Cited by
52
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 1
FWCI
13.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Health Affairs (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Healthcare Policy and Management
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Healthcare Systems and Reforms
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy
Keywords
Medicare Advantage, fee-for-service Medicare, hospital reimbursement, hospital prices, private insurance, risk adjustment, hospitalization, health insurance premiums
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Diagnosis-Related Groups, Health Expenditures, Female, Medicare, Hospitalization, Humans, Insurance, Health, Reimbursement, Male, United States, Cost Savings, Fee-for-Service Plans, Medicare Part C

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review