Medicare Advantage Plans Pay Hospitals Less Than Traditional Medicare Pays
Abstract
There is ongoing debate about how prices paid to providers by Medicare Advantage plans compare to prices paid by fee-for-service Medicare. We used data from Medicare and the Health Care Cost Institute to identify the prices paid for hospital services by fee-for-service (FFS) Medicare, Medicare Advantage plans, and commercial insurers in 2009 and 2012. We calculated the average price per admission, and its trend over time, in each of the three types of insurance for fixed baskets of hospital admissions across metropolitan areas. After accounting for differences in hospital networks, geographic areas, and case-mix between Medicare Advantage and FFS Medicare, we found that Medicare Advantage plans paid 5.6 percent less for hospital services than FFS Medicare did. Without taking into account the narrower networks of Medicare Advantage, the program paid 8.0 percent less than FFS Medicare. We also found that the rates paid by commercial plans were much higher than those of either Medicare Advantage or FFS Medicare, and growing. At least some of this difference comes from the much higher prices that commercial plans pay for profitable service lines.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Various payment incentives have been proposed and experimented with curbing the rising cost in the healthcare system to encourage healthcare providers to plan discreetly on resources, promoting risk-sharing between payers and providers.
“Various payment incentives have been proposed and experimented with curbing the rising cost in the healthcare system to encourage healthcare providers to plan discreetly on resources17,18, promoting risk-sharing between payers and providers.”
From Early prediction of diagnostic-related groups and estimation of hospital cost by processing clinical notes (2021) · cites this paper as [17]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 9 · Cited by 52
- Authors
- Baker, L. C., Bundorf, M. K., Devlin, A. M., & Kessler, D. P.
- Affiliations
- National Bureau of Economic Research (US)
- Stanford University (US)
- Hoover Institution (US)
- Venue
- Health Affairs
- Publisher
- Health Affairs Publishing, LLC
- Published
- 2016-08
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1444-1451
- ISSN
- 0278-2715 (ISSN-L)
- 1544-5208
- OpenAlex
- W2476984903
- Cited by
- 52
- References
- 9
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 1
- FWCI
- 13.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Health Affairs (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Healthcare Policy and Management
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Healthcare Systems and Reforms
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy
- Keywords
- Medicare Advantage, fee-for-service Medicare, hospital reimbursement, hospital prices, private insurance, risk adjustment, hospitalization, health insurance premiums
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Diagnosis-Related Groups, Health Expenditures, Female, Medicare, Hospitalization, Humans, Insurance, Health, Reimbursement, Male, United States, Cost Savings, Fee-for-Service Plans, Medicare Part C
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review