Cited by 222Aging, Health, and DisabilityAging, Elder Care, and Social IssuesGeriatric Care and Nursing Homes

Home-based care program reduces disability and promotes aging in place

Szanton, Sarah L., Leff, Bruce, Wolff, Jennifer L., Roberts, Laken, Gitlin, Laura N.·2016·Health Affairs

Abstract

The Community Aging in Place, Advancing Better Living for Elders (CAPABLE) program, funded by the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation, aims to reduce the impact of disability among low-income older adults by addressing individual capacities and the home environment. The program, described in this innovation profile, uses an interprofessional team (an occupational therapist, a registered nurse, and a handyman) to help participants achieve goals they set. For example, it provides assistive devices and makes home repairs and modifications that enable participants to navigate their homes more easily and safely. In the period 2012-15, a demonstration project enrolled 281 adults ages sixty-five and older who were dually eligible for Medicare and Medicaid and who had difficulty performing activities of daily living (ADLs). After completing the five-month program, 75 percent of participants had improved their performance of ADLs. Participants had difficulty with an average of 3.9 out of 8.0 ADLs at baseline, compared to 2.0 after five months. Symptoms of depression and the ability to perform instrumental ADLs such as shopping and managing medications also improved. Health systems are testing CAPABLE on a larger scale. The program has the potential to improve older adults' ability to age in place.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1377/hlthaff.2016.0140

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A demonstration project conducted in 2012-2015 revealed that 75 percent of participants had improved their performance of activities of daily living over a five-month period.

    “A demonstration project conducted in 2012–2015 revealed that 75 percent of participants had improved their performance of activities of daily living over a five-month period.”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 17 · Cited by 222

Authors
Szanton, S. L., Leff, B., Wolff, J. L., Roberts, L., & Gitlin, L. N.
Affiliations
Johns Hopkins University (US)
Venue
Health Affairs
Published
2016-09
Volume
35
Issue
9
Pages
1558-1563
ISSN
  • 0278-2715 (ISSN-L)
  • 1544-5208
OpenAlex
W2513545076
Cited by
222
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 32 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 1
FWCI
21.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Health Affairs (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (1C1CMS330970-01)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Aging, Health, and Disability
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Aging, Elder Care, and Social Issues
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
Keywords
home care, aging in place, disability prevention, older adults, activities of daily living, instrumental activities of daily living, home modification, assistive devices, multidisciplinary team, occupational therapy, low-income elderly, depression, home repair
MeSH terms
Activities of Daily Living, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aging, Cross-Sectional Studies, Disability Evaluation, Female, Disabled Persons, Persons with Disabilities, Medicare, Health Promotion, Home Care Services, Humans, Male, Patient Care Team, Poverty, Quality of Life, United States, Program Evaluation, Geriatric Assessment, Databases, Factual, Independent Living

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review