Cited by 66Healthcare Systems and ReformsHealth disparities and outcomesHealthcare Policy and Management

The United States Leads Other Nations In Differences By Income In Perceptions Of Health And Health Care

Hero, Joachim O., Zaslavsky, Alan M., Blendon, Robert J.·2017·Health Affairs

Abstract

We examined income gaps in the period 2011-13 in self-assessments of personal health and health care across thirty-two middle- and high-income countries. While high-income respondents were generally more positive about their health and health care in most countries, the gap between them and low-income respondents was much bigger in some than in others. The United States has among the largest income-related differences in each of the measures we studied, which assessed both respondents' past experiences and their confidence about accessing needed health care in the future. Relatively low levels of moral discomfort over income-based health care disparities despite broad awareness of unmet need indicate more public tolerance for health care inequalities in the United States than elsewhere. Nonetheless, over half of Americans felt that income-based health care inequalities are unfair, and these respondents were significantly more likely than their compatriots to support major health system reform-differences that reflect the country's political divisions. Given the many provisions in the Affordable Care Act that seek to reduce disparities, any replacement would also require attention to disparities or risk taking a step backward in an area where the United States is in sore need of improvement.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1377/hlthaff.2017.0006

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The U.S. leads other middle- and high-income countries in both real and perceived healthcare disparities.

    “This is a major concern globally and especially in the U.S., which already leads other middle-and high-income countries in both real and perceived healthcare disparities69,70.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hero, J. O., Zaslavsky, A. M., & Blendon, R. J.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Venue
Health Affairs
Published
2017-06
Volume
36
Issue
6
Pages
1032-1040
ISSN
  • 0278-2715 (ISSN-L)
  • 1544-5208
OpenAlex
W2621879404
Cited by
66
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 2
FWCI
11.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Health Affairs (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Healthcare Systems and Reforms
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Healthcare Policy and Management
Keywords
self-rated health, health care access, health care inequality, moral discomfort, health care reform, Affordable Care Act, cross-national comparison, United States
MeSH terms
Cross-Cultural Comparison, Health Policy, Health Services Accessibility, Humans, Income, Quality of Health Care, Socioeconomic Factors, United States, Global Health, Healthcare Disparities, Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review