Diffusion Of Innovation
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Accumulating evidence shows that diffusion is an atypical outcome, since the vast majority of innovations fail to diffuse.
“Despite the widespread acceptance of this theory, accumulating evidence shows that “diffusion is an atypical outcome, since the vast majority of innovations fail to diffuse” [2].”
From Key factors for national spread and scale-up of an eConsult innovation (2020) · cites this paper as [2]
Innovations are not self-spreading or self-replicating; diffusion is an atypical outcome.
“These points are especially important since it is well known that innovations are not self-spreading or self-replicating, and the existing evidence indicates that “diffusion is an atypical outcome” [2].”
From Key factors for national spread and scale-up of an eConsult innovation (2020) · cites this paper as [2]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
Cited by 22
- Authors
- Weil, A. R.
- Corresponding author
- Weil, Alan R.
- Venue
- Health Affairs
- Publisher
- Health Affairs Publishing, LLC
- Published
- 2018-02
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 175-175
- ISSN
- 0278-2715 (ISSN-L)
- 1544-5208
- OpenAlex
- W2785582718
- Cited by
- 22
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2020: 3
- FWCI
- 0.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Health Affairs (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Innovation Diffusion and Forecasting
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Healthcare Policy and Management
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
- Keywords
- diffusion of innovations, technology adoption, healthcare innovation
- MeSH terms
- Delivery of Health Care, Diffusion of Innovation, Humans, Organizational Innovation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
