The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Business Case For Quality: Case Studies And An Analysis
Abstract
The financial implications of implementing quality improvements are often poorly understood. Simply put, does improving quality yield a return on investment? We examine four cases--management of high-cost pharmaceuticals, diabetes management, smoking cessation, and wellness programs in the workplace--to understand the financial and clinical implications of improving care. We explore costs and benefits, in both the short and the long term, to four stakeholders with different and sometimes conflicting interests: providers, purchasers and employers, individual patients, and society. Finally, we recommend policy changes to better align financial incentives for superior quality of care.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Improving chronic illness care: translating evidence into action
Wagner, E. H., Austin, B. T., Davis, C., Hindmarsh, M., Schaefer, J., & Bonomi, A. (2001) · Health Affairs · doi:10.1377/hlthaff.20.6.64 · Cited by 3,446
Cited by
Five Years After To Err Is Human: What Have We Learned?
Leape, L. L., & Berwick, D. M. (2005) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.293.19.2384 · Cited by 1,250
Self-citationSprivulis, P. C., Da Silva, J., Jacobs, I. G., Jelinek, G. A., & Frazer, A. R. L. (2006) · Medical Journal of Australia · doi:10.5694/j.1326-5377.2006.tb00203.x · Cited by 759
Sprivulis, P. C., Da Silva, J., Jacobs, I. G., Frazer, A. R. L., & Jelinek, G. A. (2006) · Medical Journal of Australia · doi:10.5694/j.1326-5377.2006.tb00416.x · Cited by 757
Does Pay-for-Performance Improve the Quality of Health Care?
Petersen, L. A., Woodard, L. D., Urech, T., Daw, C., & Sookanan, S. (2006) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-145-4-200608150-00006 · Cited by 699
Wang, P. S., Simon, G. E., Avorn, J., Azocar, F., Ludman, E. J., McCulloch, J., Petukhova, M. Z., & Kessler, R. C. (2007) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.298.12.1401 · Cited by 408
Metadata
- Authors
- Leatherman, S., Berwick, D., Iles, D., Lewin, L. S., Davidoff, F., Nolan, T., & Bisognano, M.
- Venue
- Health Affairs
- Publisher
- Health Affairs Publishing, LLC
- Published
- 2003-03
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 17-30
- ISSN
- 0278-2715 (ISSN-L)
- 1544-5208
- OpenAlex
- W2025253724
- Cited by
- 365
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 76.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Business Case For Quality: Case Studies And An Analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1377/hlthaff.22.2.17
- The paper
- Leatherman, S., Berwick, D., Iles, D., Lewin, L. S., Davidoff, F., Nolan, T., & Bisognano, M. (2003). The Business Case For Quality: Case Studies And An Analysis. Health Affairs. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.22.2.17
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.