The DOI matches its Crossref record.
How Does The Quality Of Care Compare In Five Countries?
Abstract
International data on quality of medical care allow countries to compare their performance to that of other countries. The Commonwealth Fund International Working Group on Quality Indicators collected data on twenty-one indicators that reflect medical care in Australia, Canada, New Zealand, England, and the United States. The indicators include five-year cancer relative survival rates, thirty-day case-fatality rates after acute myocardial infarction and stroke, breast cancer screening rates, and asthma mortality rates. No country scores consistently the best or worst overall. Each country has at least one area of care where it could learn from international experiences and one area where its experiences could teach others.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Welcome to Implementation Science
Eccles, M. P., & Mittman, B. S. (2006) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/1748-5908-1-1 · Cited by 2,254
Gaps between knowing and doing: Understanding and assessing the barriers to optimal health care
Cochrane, L. J., Olson, C. A., Murray, S., Dupuis, M., Tooman, T., & Hayes, S. (2007) · Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions · doi:10.1002/chp.106 · Cited by 500
Schoen, C., Osborn, R., Huynh, P. T., Doty, M., Peugh, J., & Zapert, K. (2006) · Health Affairs · doi:10.1377/hlthaff.25.w555 · Cited by 331
Self-citationDeveloping a theory‐based taxonomy of methods for implementing change in practice
Leeman, J., Baernholdt, M., & Sandelowski, M. (2007) · Journal of Advanced Nursing · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2006.04207.x · Cited by 120
Shi, L., Tsai, J., Higgins, P. C., & Lebrun, L. A. (2009) · Journal of Ambulatory Care Management · doi:10.1097/jac.0b013e3181ba6fd8 · Cited by 54
Metadata
- Authors
- Hussey, P. S., Anderson, G. F., Osborn, R., Feek, C., McLaughlin, V., Millar, J., & Epstein, A.
- Venue
- Health Affairs
- Publisher
- Health Affairs Publishing, LLC
- Published
- 2004-05
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 89-99
- ISSN
- 0278-2715 (ISSN-L)
- 1544-5208
- OpenAlex
- W2120406111
- Cited by
- 184
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 62.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: How Does The Quality Of Care Compare In Five Countries? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1377/hlthaff.23.3.89
- The paper
- Hussey, P. S., Anderson, G. F., Osborn, R., Feek, C., McLaughlin, V., Millar, J., & Epstein, A. (2004). How Does The Quality Of Care Compare In Five Countries? Health Affairs. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.23.3.89
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.