Lessons for Continuing Medical Education From Simulation Research in Undergraduate and Graduate Medical Education
Abstract
Background Simulation technology is widely used in undergraduate and graduate medical education as well as for personnel training and evaluation in other healthcare professions. Simulation provides safe and effective opportunities for learners at all levels to practice and acquire clinical skills needed for patient care. A growing body of research evidence documents the utility of simulation technology for educating healthcare professionals. However, simulation has not been widely endorsed or used for continuing medical education (CME). Methods This article reviews and evaluates evidence from studies on simulation technology in undergraduate and graduate medical education and addresses its implications for CME. Results The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Evidence Report suggests that simulation training is effective, especially for psychomotor and communication skills, but that the strength of the evidence is low. In another review, the Best Evidence Medical Education collaboration supported the use of simulation technology, focusing on high-fidelity medical simulations under specific conditions. Other studies enumerate best practices that include mastery learning, deliberate practice, and recognition and attention to cultural barriers within the medical profession that present obstacles to wider use of this technology. Conclusions Simulation technology is a powerful tool for the education of physicians and other healthcare professionals at all levels. Its educational effectiveness depends on informed use for trainees, including providing feedback, engaging learners in deliberate practice, integrating simulation into an overall curriculum, as well as on the instruction and competence of faculty in its use. Medical simulation complements, but does not replace, educational activities based on real patient-care experiences.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Virtual patients effectively foster intrinsic motivation and baseline clinical reasoning competence.
“While VPs effectively foster intrinsic motivation and baseline clinical reasoning competence”
From A large language model digital patient system enhances ophthalmology history taking skills (2025) · cites this paper as [20]
Maintaining virtual patients' utility requires continuous updates to reflect evolving clinical standards.
“maintaining their utility requires continuous updates to reflect evolving clinical standards17–20.”
From A large language model digital patient system enhances ophthalmology history taking skills (2025) · cites this paper as [20]
Cites
The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance
Ericsson, K. A., Krampe, R. T., & Tesch-Römer, C. (1993) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.100.3.363 · Cited by 9,564 · see citing works
Moher, D., Cook, D. J., Eastwood, S., Olkin, I., Rennie, D., & Stroup, D. F. (1999) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(99)04149-5 · Cited by 4,826 · see citing works
Barry Issenberg, S., Mcgaghie, W. C., Petrusa, E. R., Lee Gordon, D., & Scalese, R. J. (2005) · Medical Teacher · doi:10.1080/01421590500046924 · Cited by 3,966 · see citing works
Self-citationEricsson, K. A. (2004) · Academic Medicine · doi:10.1097/00001888-200410001-00022 · Cited by 2,988 · see citing works
Ericsson, K. A. (2007) · Medical Education · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2923.2007.02946.x · Cited by 271 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A critical review of simulation‐based medical education research: 2003–2009
McGaghie, W. C., Issenberg, S. B., Petrusa, E. R., & Scalese, R. J. (2010) · Medical Education · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03547.x · Cited by 1,733 · see citing works
Self-citationStandardized Patients in Medical Education: A Review of the Literature
Flanagan, O. L., & Cummings, K. M. (2023) · Cureus · doi:10.7759/cureus.42027 · Cited by 81 · see citing works
Resident duty hours in Canada: past, present and future
Pattani, R., Wu, P. E., & Dhalla, I. A. (2014) · Canadian Medical Association Journal · doi:10.1503/cmaj.131053 · Cited by 72 · see citing works
A large language model digital patient system enhances ophthalmology history taking skills
Luo, M.-J., Bi, S., Pang, J., Liu, L., Tsui, C.-K., Lai, Y., Chen, W., Yang, Y., Xu, K., Zhao, L., et al. (2025) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-025-01841-6 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
“While VPs effectively foster intrinsic motivation and baseline clinical reasoning competence, maintaining their utility requires continuous updates to re fl ect evolving clinical standards 17 – 20 .”
- Authors
- McGaghie, W. C., Siddall, V. J., Mazmanian, P. E., & Myers, J.
- Affiliations
- Northwestern University (US)
- American College of Chest Physicians (US)
- Virginia Commonwealth University (US)
- Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences (US)
- Corresponding author
- McGaghie, William C.
- ORCID
- McGaghie, William C.
- Venue
- Chest
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2009-03
- Volume
- 135
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 62S-68S
- ISSN
- 0012-3692 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2131804230
- Cited by
- 248
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 25 · 2012: 18
- FWCI
- 1.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- CHEST Journal (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Surgical Simulation and Training
- Keywords
- simulation-based medical education, continuing medical education, undergraduate medical education, graduate medical education, high-fidelity simulation, psychomotor skills, communication skills, deliberate practice, learning mastery, faculty competence
- MeSH terms
- Computer-Assisted Instruction, Computer Simulation, Curriculum, Education, Medical, Continuing, Education, Medical, Graduate, Education, Medical, Undergraduate, Humans, Research Design, United States, Practice Guidelines as Topic
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review