Cited by 248Simulation-Based Education in HealthcareInnovations in Medical EducationSurgical Simulation and Training

Lessons for Continuing Medical Education From Simulation Research in Undergraduate and Graduate Medical Education

McGaghie, William C., Siddall, Viva J., Mazmanian, Paul E., Myers, Janet·2009·Chest

Abstract

Background Simulation technology is widely used in undergraduate and graduate medical education as well as for personnel training and evaluation in other healthcare professions. Simulation provides safe and effective opportunities for learners at all levels to practice and acquire clinical skills needed for patient care. A growing body of research evidence documents the utility of simulation technology for educating healthcare professionals. However, simulation has not been widely endorsed or used for continuing medical education (CME). Methods This article reviews and evaluates evidence from studies on simulation technology in undergraduate and graduate medical education and addresses its implications for CME. Results The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Evidence Report suggests that simulation training is effective, especially for psychomotor and communication skills, but that the strength of the evidence is low. In another review, the Best Evidence Medical Education collaboration supported the use of simulation technology, focusing on high-fidelity medical simulations under specific conditions. Other studies enumerate best practices that include mastery learning, deliberate practice, and recognition and attention to cultural barriers within the medical profession that present obstacles to wider use of this technology. Conclusions Simulation technology is a powerful tool for the education of physicians and other healthcare professionals at all levels. Its educational effectiveness depends on informed use for trainees, including providing feedback, engaging learners in deliberate practice, integrating simulation into an overall curriculum, as well as on the instruction and competence of faculty in its use. Medical simulation complements, but does not replace, educational activities based on real patient-care experiences.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1378/chest.08-2521

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McGaghie, W. C., Siddall, V. J., Mazmanian, P. E., & Myers, J.
Affiliations
  • Northwestern University (US)
  • American College of Chest Physicians (US)
  • Virginia Commonwealth University (US)
  • Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences (US)
Corresponding author
McGaghie, William C.
Venue
Chest
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-03
Volume
135
Issue
3
Pages
62S-68S
ISSN
0012-3692 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2131804230
Cited by
248
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 25 · 2012: 18
FWCI
1.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • CHEST Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Surgical Simulation and Training
Keywords
simulation-based medical education, continuing medical education, undergraduate medical education, graduate medical education, high-fidelity simulation, psychomotor skills, communication skills, deliberate practice, learning mastery, faculty competence
MeSH terms
Computer-Assisted Instruction, Computer Simulation, Curriculum, Education, Medical, Continuing, Education, Medical, Graduate, Education, Medical, Undergraduate, Humans, Research Design, United States, Practice Guidelines as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review