The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Localization of Bronchial Intraepithelial Neoplastic Lesions by Fluorescence Bronchoscopy
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: In the treatment of lung cancer, the best outcome is achieved when the lesion is discovered in the intraepithelial (preinvasive) stage. However, intraepithelial neoplastic lesions are difficult to localize by conventional white-light bronchoscopy (WLB). OBJECTIVE: To determine if autofluorescence bronchoscopy, when used as an adjunct to WLB, could improve the bronchoscopist's ability to locate and remove biopsy specimens from areas suspicious of intraepithelial neoplasia as compared with WLB alone. METHOD: A multicenter clinical trial was conducted in seven institutions in the United States and Canada. WLB followed by fluorescence examination with the light-induced fluorescence endoscopy (LIFE) device was performed in 173 subjects known or suspected to have lung cancer. Biopsy specimens were taken from all areas suspicious of moderate dysplasia or worse on WLB and/or LIFE examination. In addition, random biopsy specimens were also taken from other parts of the bronchial tree. RESULTS: The relative sensitivity of WLB + LIFE vs WLB alone was 6.3 for intraepithelial neoplastic lesions and 2.71 when invasive carcinomas were also included. The positive predictive value was 0.33 and 0.39 and the negative predictive value was 0.89 and 0.83, respectively, for WLB+LIFE and WLB alone. CONCLUSION: Autofluorescence bronchoscopy, when used as an adjunct to standard WLB, enhances the bronchoscopist's ability to localize small neoplastic lesions, especially intraepithelial lesions that may have significant implication in the management of lung cancer in the future.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Minna, J. D., Roth, J. A., & Gazdar, A. F. (2002) · Cancer Cell · doi:10.1016/s1535-6108(02)00027-2 · Cited by 549
Self-citationHirsch, F. R., Prindiville, S. A., Miller, Y. E., Franklin, W. A., Dempsey, E. C., Murphy, J. R., Bunn, P. A., & Kennedy, T. C. (2001) · JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/93.18.1385 · Cited by 257
Self-citationLiu, W., Baer, M. R., Bowman, M. J., Pera, P., Zheng, X., Morgan, J., Pandey, R. A., & Oseroff, A. R. (2007) · Clinical Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-06-1599 · Cited by 136
Metadata
- Authors
- Lam, S., Kennedy, T., Unger, M., Miller, Y. E., Gelmont, D., Rusch, V., Gipe, B., Howard, D., LeRiche, J. C., Coldman, A., & Gazdar, A. F.
- Venue
- Chest
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1998-03
- Volume
- 113
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 696-702
- ISSN
- 0012-3692 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2118963481
- Cited by
- 571
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 37.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Localization of Bronchial Intraepithelial Neoplastic Lesions by Fluorescence Bronchoscopy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1378/chest.113.3.696
- The paper
- Lam, S., Kennedy, T., Unger, M., Miller, Y. E., Gelmont, D., Rusch, V., Gipe, B., Howard, D., LeRiche, J. C., Coldman, A., & Gazdar, A. F. (1998). Localization of Bronchial Intraepithelial Neoplastic Lesions by Fluorescence Bronchoscopy. Chest. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.113.3.696
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.