Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 373

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Infective Exacerbations of Chronic Bronchitis

Open access
Eller, Jörg, Ede, Anja, Schaberg, Tom, Niederman, Michael S., Mauch, Harald, Lode, Hartmut·1998·Chest

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVE: In patients with severe COPD, acute infective exacerbations are frequent. Streptococcus pneumoniae and Haemophilus influenzae are the most commonly isolated bacteria in sputum cultures from these patients. We hypothesized that in patients with advanced disease, Gram-negative bacteria other than H influenzae play at least an equally important role. METHODS: We evaluated clinical data and sputum culture results from 211 unselected COPD patients admitted to our hospital with an acute infective exacerbation of COPD. One hundred twelve patients fulfilled our protocol criteria of reliable microbiologic results and reproducible lung function tests; the patients were categorized according to the recently published three stages of severity. RESULTS: Lung function tests revealed an FEV1 of > or =50% of the predicted value in 30 patients (stage I), an FEV1 of 35% to <50% of the predicted value in 30 patients (stage II), and an FEV1 of < or =35% of the predicted value in 34 patients (stage III). Bacteria were classified into three groups: group 1 contained S pneumoniae and other Gram-positive cocci; group 2, H influenzae and Moraxella catarrhalis; and group 3, Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas spp. For all patients together, the most frequently isolated bacteria were group 3 organisms (Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas spp, 48.2%), followed by group 1 organisms (S pneumoniae and other Gram-positive cocci, 30.4%), and group 2 organisms (H influenzae and M catarrhalis, 21.4%). In stage I patients, 14 of 30 had bacteria from group 1, seven of 30 had group 2, and nine of 30 had group 3. In stage II patients, eight of 30 had group 1 bacteria, 10 of 30 had group 2, and 12 of 30 had group 3. In stage III patients, 12 of 52 had group 1 bacteria, seven of 52 had group 2, and 22 of 52 had group 3. The three groups of bacteria causing infective exacerbations were unevenly distributed among the three severity stages of lung function (p=0.016). CONCLUSION: There is a correlation between deterioration of lung function and the bacteria isolated from patients with infective exacerbations of COPD. In acute infective exacerbations, Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas spp are the predominant bacteria in patients with an FEV1 < or =35% of the predicted value.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1378/chest.113.6.1542

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 373

Metadata

Authors
Eller, J., Ede, A., Schaberg, T., Niederman, M. S., Mauch, H., & Lode, H.
Venue
Chest
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1998-06
Volume
113
Issue
6
Pages
1542-1548
ISSN
0012-3692 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2005976577
Cited by
373
References
0
FWCI
21.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Infective Exacerbations of Chronic Bronchitis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1378/chest.113.6.1542
The paper
Eller, J., Ede, A., Schaberg, T., Niederman, M. S., Mauch, H., & Lode, H. (1998). Infective Exacerbations of Chronic Bronchitis. Chest. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.113.6.1542

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.