Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 329

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Primary Graft Failure Following Lung Transplantation

Open access
Christie, Jason D., Bavaria, Joseph E., Palevsky, Harold I., Litzky, Leslie, Blumenthal, Nancy P., Kaiser, Larry R., Kotloff, Robert M.·1998·Chest

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVES: To determine the incidence of primary graft failure (PGF) following lung transplantation, assess possible risk factors, and characterize its effect on outcomes. METHODS: Retrospective review of 100 consecutive patients undergoing lung transplantation at the University of Pennsylvania Medical Center. Fifteen patients meeting diagnostic criteria for PGF (PGF+ group) were compared with 85 patients without this complication (PGF- group). RESULTS: The incidence of PGF was 15%. There was no significant difference in age, sex, underlying pulmonary disease, preoperative pulmonary artery systolic pressure, type of transplant, allograft ischemic times, use of cardiopulmonary bypass, or use of postoperative prostaglandin E1 infusion between the PGF+ and PGF- groups. Induction therapy with antilymphocyte globulin was used less frequently in the PGF+ group (p<0.005). Duration of mechanical ventilatory support was 36+/-43 days vs 4+/-6 days for the PGF+ and PGF- groups, respectively (p<0.0001). Hospital stay was significantly longer in the PGF+ group, averaging 75+/-105 days, compared with 27+/-38 days in the PGF group (p<0.005). One-year actuarial survival for the PGF+ group was only 40% compared with 69% for the PGF- group (p<0.005). Five of the six PGF+ survivors were ambulatory by 1 year; three were completely independent while two continued to require assistance with activities of daily living. Six-minute walk test distance among the ambulatory patients averaged 883+/-463 feet (range, 200 to 1,223 feet) compared with 1513+/-424 feet for the PGF- group (p<0.005). Among the subset of survivors who underwent single lung transplantation for COPD, the mean percent predicted FEV1 at 1 year was 43% for the PGF+ group and 55% for the PGF- groups, but this difference was not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: PGF is a devastating postoperative complication, occurring in 15% of patients in the current series, and it is associated with a high mortality rate, lengthy hospitalization, and protracted and often compromised recovery among survivors.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1378/chest.114.1.51

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 13 references

Cited by

See all 329

Metadata

Authors
Christie, J. D., Bavaria, J. E., Palevsky, H. I., Litzky, L., Blumenthal, N. P., Kaiser, L. R., & Kotloff, R. M.
Venue
Chest
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1998-07
Volume
114
Issue
1
Pages
51-60
ISSN
0012-3692 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2146102937
Cited by
329
References
13
FWCI
14.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Primary Graft Failure Following Lung Transplantation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1378/chest.114.1.51
The paper
Christie, J. D., Bavaria, J. E., Palevsky, H. I., Litzky, L., Blumenthal, N. P., Kaiser, L. R., & Kotloff, R. M. (1998). Primary Graft Failure Following Lung Transplantation. Chest. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.114.1.51

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.