Neurohumoral activation as a link to systemic manifestations of chronic lung disease
Abstract
COPD is a major cause of death and disability worldwide. Treatment of COPD improves lung function but is unlikely to slow the steady downhill course of the disease or reduce mortality. In COPD, numerous abnormalities can be found outside the lung. These include systemic inflammation, cachexia, and skeletal muscle dysfunction. Thus, COPD has been called a systemic disease. Convincing data demonstrate that COPD causes neurohumoral activation. By precedents derived from chronic heart failure and other diseases characterized by neurohumoral activation, we propose that the negative consequences of neurohumoral activation, namely inflammation, cachexia, effects on ventilation, and skeletal muscle dysfunction, give rise to a self-perpetuating cycle that contributes to the pathogenesis of COPD, and which may involve respiratory muscle dysfunction as well as systemic inflammation. This concept may further help explain the increased cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in COPD patients. Currently, little is known about the effect of treatments directed at neurohumoral activation and COPD. As this aspect of COPD becomes better understood, new insights may direct novel therapeutic approaches.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The pulmonary pathology of COPD is accompanied by systemic abnormalities including inflammation and neuro-humoral activation.
“The pulmonary pathology of COPD is accompanied by systemic abnormalities including inflammation and neuro-humoral activation (Andreas et al., 2005)”
From Effectiveness of a Novel Qigong Meditative Movement Practice for Impaired Health in Flight Attendants Exposed to Second-Hand Cigarette Smoke (2017) · cites this paper as Andreas et al., 2005
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 78 · Cited by 243
- Authors
- Andreas, S., Anker, S. D., Scanlon, P. D., & Somers, V. K.
- Affiliations
- University of Göttingen (DE)
- Mayo Clinic (US)
- Corresponding author
- Andreas, Stefan
- Venue
- Chest
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2005-11
- Volume
- 128
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 3618-3624
- ISSN
- 0012-3692 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2082097252
- Cited by
- 243
- References
- 78
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 22
- FWCI
- 2.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- CHEST Journal (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- GRO (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Asthma and respiratory diseases
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Pulmonary Hypertension Research and Treatments
- Keywords
- chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, neurohormonal activation, systemic manifestations, systemic inflammation, cachexia, skeletal muscle dysfunction, respiratory muscle dysfunction, cardiovascular morbidity, pathogenesis, chronic heart failure
- MeSH terms
- Aldosterone, Animals, Cachexia, Cardiovascular Diseases, Heart Rate, Humans, Nordefrin, Renin, Respiratory Muscles, Risk Factors, Sympathetic Nervous System, Comorbidity, Bronchoconstriction, Leptin, Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review