Cited by 82Obstructive Sleep Apnea ResearchSleep and related disordersNeuroscience of respiration and sleep

Risk Factors Associated With Snoring in Women With Special Emphasis on Body Mass Index

Svensson, Malin, Lindberg, Eva, Naessen, Tord, Janson, Christer·2006·Chest

Abstract

Study objectives Habitual snoring may be regarded as an indicator of sleep-disordered breathing, and the health consequences of sleep-disordered breathing are well-known. The aim of this study was to analyze the risk factors associated with habitual snoring in a large sample of women, with special emphasis on the determinants of snoring in women with different body mass index (BMI) levels.Design and setting A cross-sectional, epidemiologic, population-based study was performed by using a postal questionnaire that was sent to a randomly selected sample of 6,817 women >/= 20 years of age in Uppsala, Sweden.Results The total prevalence of self-reported habitual snoring was 7.6%. There was a clear age dependence, with the highest prevalence of habitual snoring (14%) occurring between the ages of 50 and 59 years. Self-reported habitual snoring was related to BMI, neck circumference, and smoking >/= 10 cigarettes a day, after adjusting for possible confounders. When analyzing the influence of different risk factors in separate BMI groups, the results varied among the groups. The influence of alcohol dependence on snoring frequency was only significant in women with a BMI of < 20 kg/m(2), while physical inactivity was only associated with habitual snoring in women with a BMI of >/= 30 kg/m(2).Conclusions The prevalence of self-reported habitual snoring in women was strongly dependent on age and BMI. The importance of other risk factors differed depending on BMI, with alcohol dependence being associated with self-reported snoring in lean women, whereas physical inactivity was a risk factor for self-reported snoring in women with a high BMI.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1378/chest.129.4.933

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 47 · Cited by 82

Authors
Svensson, M., Lindberg, E., Naessen, T., & Janson, C.
Affiliations
Uppsala University (SE)
Venue
Chest
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-04
Volume
129
Issue
4
Pages
933-941
ISSN
0012-3692 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2000148015
Cited by
82
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 4
FWCI
3.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • CHEST Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Neuroscience of respiration and sleep
Keywords
habitual snoring, women, body mass index, sleep-disordered breathing, risk factors, neck circumference, smoking, alcoholism, physical inactivity, snoring prevalence, obesity
MeSH terms
Adult, Age Factors, Aged, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Life Style, Middle Aged, Risk Factors, Smoking, Snoring, Exercise, Body Mass Index, Body Size

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review