Cited by 65Obstructive Sleep Apnea ResearchHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic ControlNeuroscience of respiration and sleep

Autonomic Cardiac Modulation in Obstructive Sleep Apnea

Open access
Coruzzi, Paolo, Gualerzi, Massimo, Bernkopf, Edoardo, Brambilla, Lorenzo, Brambilla, Valerio, Broia, Vanna, Lombardi, Carolina, Parati, Gianfranco·2006·Chest

Abstract

Background Patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) are characterized by deranged cardiovascular variability, a well-established marker of cardiovascular risk. While long-term treatment with continuous positive airway pressure leads to a significant improvement of cardiovascular variability, little is known of the possibility of achieving the same results with other therapeutic approaches. The aim of our study was to investigate the responses of autonomic indexes of neural cardiac control to another type of OSA treatment based on an oral jaw-positioning appliance.Methods In 10 otherwise healthy subjects with OSA (OSA+) and in 10 subjects without OSA (OSA-) we measured heart rate, BP, and indices of autonomic cardiac regulation derived from time-domain and spectral analysis of R-R interval (RRI), before and after 3 months of treatment with the oral device. High-frequency (HF) power of RRI was taken as an index of parasympathetic cardiac modulation, and the ratio between low-frequency (LF) and HF RRI powers as an indirect marker of the balance between sympathetic and parasympathetic cardiac modulation.Results At baseline, in comparison with OSA- subjects, OSA+ subjects displayed a significantly lower RRI variance (p < 0.02) and reduced HF RRI powers (p < 0.001). After 3 months of treatment with the oral device, the OSA+ group showed a marked reduction in apnea-hypopnea index (p < 0.001), a lengthening in RRI and a significant increase in its variance (p < 0,02), an increased HF RRI power (from 134 +/- 26 to 502 +/- 48 ms2, p < 0.001), and a reduction in LF/HF RRI power ratio (from 3.11 +/- 0.8 to 1.5 +/- 0.5). As a result of these changes, after the 3-month treatment there were no more significant differences between the two groups in these parameters. In both OSA+ and OSA- groups, body weight, heart rate, and BP did not change over time.Conclusions Three months of treatment with a specific oral jaw-positioning appliance improves cardiac autonomic modulation in otherwise healthy patients with OSA of mild degree.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1378/chest.130.5.1362

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Promising effects on blood pressure, cardiac function, endothelial function, markers of oxidative stress and simulated driving performance have been reported from mandibular advancement devices.

    “Promising effects on blood pressure, cardiac function, endothelial function, markers of oxidative stress and simulated driving performance have been reported from MADs 66, 69, 84, 94–99.”

    From Non-CPAP therapies in obstructive sleep apnoea (2011) · cites this paper as [95]

    The Abstract (p. 1362) and Discussion report improved cardiac autonomic modulation after treatment with an oral jaw-positioning appliance, supporting the cardiac aspect of the claim. The Abstract says blood pressure did not change, and the paper does not report effects on endothelial function, oxidative-stress markers, or simulated driving performance. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 52 · Cited by 65

Authors
Coruzzi, P., Gualerzi, M., Bernkopf, E., Brambilla, L., Brambilla, V., Broia, V., Lombardi, C., & Parati, G.
Affiliations
University of Parma (IT)
Corresponding author
Gualerzi, Massimo
Venue
Chest
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-11
Volume
130
Issue
5
Pages
1362-1368
ISSN
0012-3692 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2150907498
Cited by
65
References
52
Citations by year
2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 4
FWCI
2.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • CHEST Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • BOA (University of Milano-Bicocca) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Neuroscience of respiration and sleep
Keywords
obstructive sleep apnea, sympathetic and parasympathetic balance, heart rate variability, RR interval, cardiovascular variability, apnea-hypopnea index, alternative sleep apnea treatment
MeSH terms
Adult, Autonomic Nervous System, Blood Pressure, Dental Occlusion, Electrocardiography, Female, Heart, Heart Rate, Humans, Jaw, Male, Middle Aged, Parasympathetic Nervous System, Sympathetic Nervous System, Case-Control Studies, Occlusal Splints, Sleep Apnea, Obstructive, Continuous Positive Airway Pressure

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review