The DOI matches its Crossref record; 16 of the 16 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Compliance with Surgical After-care following Bariatric Surgery for Morbid Obesity: a Retrospective Study
Abstract
Background Non-compliant patients fail to match their behavior to the clinical prescription. Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding requires strict compliance with surgical and dietary advice. Failure to attend follow-up appointments and the persistent consumption of calorie-dense liquid foods are associated with poor weight loss and postoperative complications. Prediction of "poor compliers" would enhance candidate selection and enable specific interventions to be targeted.Methods 9 poor compliers were identified and compared with 9 fully compliant controls. Case-notes were analyzed retrospectively.Results Cases were found to graze on foods and eat more in response to negative affects. They were reluctant to undergo psychiatric assessment, viewed the band as responsible for weight loss, and aroused caution in the psychiatric evaluator. Poor compliance was not associated with binge eating, purging, impulsivity or psychiatric illness.Conclusions Unrealistic expectations and anxiety are known to predict non-adherence. Constant negative affects may be self-modulated by grazing. The results are explored in the context of Self-efficacy Theory, a socio-cognitive account of illness behavior.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“pre‐operative grazing (i.e., picking/nibbling), 33 pre‐operative night‐eating, 30 or a history of combined mood and eating disorder 34 is predictive of poorer adherence to dietary recommendations in RYGB and gastric band patients.”
From Psychological predictors of adherence to lifestyle changes after bariatric surgery: A systematic review (2024) · cites this paper as [33]
In the citing paper
“pre‐operative emotional eating, 33 pre‐operative grazing (i.e., picking/nibbling), 33 pre‐operative night‐eating, 30 or a history of combined mood and eating disorder 34 is predictive of poorer adherence to dietary recommendations in RYGB and gastric band patients.”
From Psychological predictors of adherence to lifestyle changes after bariatric surgery: A systematic review (2024) · cites this paper as [33]
In the citing paper
“No differences between the groups were noted with regard to pre‐operative binge eating disorder, bulimia nervosa, mood disorders, alcohol abuse, child sexual abuse history, insight about obesity, and the belief that the band is responsible for weight loss”
From Psychological predictors of adherence to lifestyle changes after bariatric surgery: A systematic review (2024) · cites this paper as [33]
In the citing paper
“but non‐compliers were more likely to report pre‐operative emotional eating.”
From Psychological predictors of adherence to lifestyle changes after bariatric surgery: A systematic review (2024) · cites this paper as [33]
Citations
Cites
Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency
Bandura, A. (1982) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.37.2.122 · Cited by 15,975
Hocus-pocus, the focus isn't strictly on locus: Rotter's social learning theory modified for health
Wallston, K. A. (1992) · Cognitive Therapy and Research · doi:10.1007/bf01173488 · Cited by 409
Medical and psychiatric morbidity in obese women with and without binge eating
Bulik, C. M., Sullivan, P. F., & Kendler, K. S. (2002) · International Journal of Eating Disorders · doi:10.1002/eat.10072 · Cited by 297
Impact of Patient Follow-Up on Weight Loss after Bariatric Surgery
Shen, R., Dugay, G., Rajaram, K., Cabrera, I., Siegel, N., & Ren, C. J. (2004) · Obesity Surgery · doi:10.1381/096089204323013523 · Cited by 260
"Grazing": A High-Risk Behavior
Saunders, R. (2004) · Obesity Surgery · doi:10.1381/096089204772787374 · Cited by 216
The Psychology of Gastric Bypass Surgery
Glinski, J., Wetzler, S. E., & Goodman, E. (2001) · Obesity Surgery · doi:10.1381/09608920160557057 · Cited by 177
Self-efficacy, outcome, and attrition in a weight-reduction program
Bernier, M., & Avard, J. (1986) · Cognitive Therapy and Research · doi:10.1007/bf01173469 · Cited by 171
Sogg, S., & Mori, D. L. (2004) · Obesity Surgery · doi:10.1381/096089204322917909 · Cited by 86
History of sexual abuse and obesity treatment outcome
King, T. K., Clark, M. M., & Pera, V. (1996) · Addictive Behaviors · doi:10.1016/0306-4603(95)00058-5 · Cited by 85
Adaptability and Compliance of the Obese Patient to Restrictive Gastric Surgery in the Short Term
Pessina, A., Andreoli, M., & Vassallo, C. (2001) · Obesity Surgery · doi:10.1381/096089201321209332 · Cited by 60
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–113 of 113
A temperament based perspective on eating behaviour and appetite in the overweight and obese
Mackey, L. (2017) · Queensland University of Technology · doi:10.5204/thesis.eprints.103082
Psychosocial presentation of revisional and primary bariatric surgery patients
van Vuuren, M. J. (2016) · Queensland University of Technology · doi:10.5204/thesis.eprints.99501
Larjani, S., Spivak, I., Guo, M. H., Aliarzadeh, B., Wang, W., Robinson, S., Sockalingam, S., & Aarts, M.-A. W. (2016)
Edgerton, C. A., & Shikora, S. A. (2020) · Difficult decisions in surgery: an evidence-based approach · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-55329-6_17
Santhouse, R. (2008) · D-Scholarship@Pitt (University of Pittsburgh)
Harjula, S. (2013) · KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology)
Troisi, A. (2020) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-44834-9_6
Obezite Tedavisinde Bariatrik Cerrahi Yaklaşımlar ve Hemşirelik Bakımı
Yeşilyurt, K. Ö. (2023) · Özgür Yayınları eBooks · doi:10.58830/ozgur.pub219
Special Nursing Considerations in Caring for the Bariatric Patient
Zarrella, S. (2024) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-70004-0_28
Lier, H. Ø. (2012) · NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives
GUIDELINES FOR THE NUTRITIONAL MANAGEMENT OF BARIATRIC SURGERY PATIENTS: PRE- AND POST-OPERATIVELY
Kreider, R. (2010) · D-Scholarship@Pitt (University of Pittsburgh)
Metadata
- Authors
- Poole, N. A., Atar, A. A., Kuhanendran, D., Bidlake, L., Fiennes, A., McCluskey, S., Nussey, S., Bano, G., & Morgan, J. F.
- Affiliations
- St George's Hospital (GB)
- Venue
- Obesity Surgery
- Published
- 2005-02
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 261-265
- ISSN
- 0960-8923 (ISSN-L)
- 1708-0428
- OpenAlex
- W2016632969
- Cited by
- 115
- References
- 16
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 3.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Obesity Surgery (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity and Health Practices
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Body Contouring and Surgery
- Keywords
- bariatric surgery, morbid obesity
- MeSH terms
- Adaptation, Physiological, Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Obesity, Morbid, Patient Compliance, Postoperative Care, Probability, Retrospective Studies, Time Factors, Gastroplasty, Body Mass Index, Incidence, Case-Control Studies, Age Distribution, Sex Distribution, Risk Assessment, Self Efficacy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
