Cited by 47Bariatric Surgery and OutcomesCardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical OutcomesAirway Management and Intubation Techniques

The Value of Pulmonary Function Testing Prior to Bariatric Surgery

Hamoui, Nahid, Anthone, Gary, Crookes, Peter·2006·Obesity Surgery

Abstract

Background Pulmonary function tests (PFTs) are often abnormal in the morbidly obese and improve after bariatric surgery. Our aim was to determine the utility of obtaining preoperative PFTs in assessing postoperative risk. Methods 146 consecutive patients undergoing open bariatric surgery were analyzed. Patients were divided into those who had postoperative complications (Group A, n=27) and those who did not (Group B, n=119). PFTs and BMI were compared between Groups A and B. PFT parameters are reported as the median percentage of age-matched controls. Results Patients in Group A compared to Group B were heavier (BMI 58 vs 51 kg/m(2), P=.001) and older (46 vs 40 years, P=.02) than those in group B. They had reduced forced vital capacity (80% vs 97%, P<.001) and forced expiratory volume in 1 second (84% vs 99%, P=.002). They also had reduced vital capacity (VC, 85% vs 102%, P<.001) and total lung capacity (89% vs 99%, P=.01). They had decreased maximal voluntary ventilation (93% vs 106%, P=.003). They had lower arterial pO(2) (76 mmHg vs 85 mmHg, P=.001) and higher arterial-alveolar gradient (23 vs 17, P=.007). The strongest predictors of postoperative complications on multivariate analysis were reduced VC (RR 2.29 for each 10% decrease in VC, P=.0007) and age (RR 6.4 for age >40 years, P=.01). Conclusions PFTs help to predict complications after bariatric surgery. The greatest reduction in VC may occur in patients with central obesity, reflecting increased intrabdominal pressure and diminished chest wall compliance.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1381/096089206779319356

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Added weight on the thorax and abdomen (and also the neck) can significantly affect static and dynamic lung volumes along with respiratory mechanics, usually in a dose-response fashion.

    “Added weight on the thorax and abdomen (and also the neck), can significantly affect static and dynamic lung volumes along with respiratory mechanics,92–112 usually in a dose-response fashion.”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hamoui, N., Anthone, G., & Crookes, P.
Affiliations
University of Southern California (US)
Venue
Obesity Surgery
Published
2006-12-01
Volume
16
Issue
12
Pages
1570-1573
ISSN
  • 0960-8923 (ISSN-L)
  • 1708-0428
OpenAlex
W2041382620
Cited by
47
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 5
FWCI
3.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Obesity Surgery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Airway Management and Intubation Techniques
Keywords
pulmonary function tests, bariatric surgery
MeSH terms
Adult, Age Factors, Female, Forced Expiratory Volume, Humans, Lung, Male, Middle Aged, Obesity, Morbid, Postoperative Complications, Predictive Value of Tests, Preoperative Care, Respiratory Function Tests, Risk Factors, Severity of Illness Index, Sex Factors, Total Lung Capacity, Vital Capacity, Body Mass Index, Multivariate Analysis, Bariatric Surgery

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review