The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Reading as participatory art: An alternative mental health therapy
Abstract
This article outlines the health and well-being impacts of a specific community reading programme, ‘Get into Reading’, pioneered by The Reader Organisation, as demonstrated in a specific health context, Mersey Care NHS Mental Health Trust. The discussion broadly considers the historical positioning of this reading and health experiment, in terms of both mental health and arts-in-health developments and trends. The article also highlights some of the challenges and excitements of seeking to capture the health benefits of reading currently experienced by the Centre for Research into Reading, Information and Linguistic Systems (CRILS) at University of Liverpool.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“For example, group-based studies record positive impact on measures of cognitive performance like concentration, memory, social skills, and creativity, as well as affective change in the direction of increased confidence, fewer feelings of isolation, and improvement on markers of depression [6, 18–20].”
From Five studies evaluating the impact on mental health and mood of recalling, reading, and discussing fiction (2022) · cites this paper as [6]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Carney, J., & Robertson, C. (2022) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0266323 · Cited by 25
Metadata
- Authors
- Billington, J., Davis, P., & Farrington, G.
- Affiliations
- University of Liverpool (GB)
- Venue
- Journal of Arts & Communities
- Publisher
- Intellect
- Published
- 2013-04-01
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 25-40
- ISSN
- 1757-1936 (ISSN-L)
- 1757-1944
- OpenAlex
- W2020053744
- Cited by
- 37
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 8 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 41.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Arts & Communities (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Arts and Humanities Research Council (AH/I507574/1)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Art Therapy and Mental Health
- Social Sciences › Education › Literacy and Educational Practices
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Music Therapy and Health
- Keywords
- reading, participatory art, psychotherapy, arts and health
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
