The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Microfake: How small-scale deepfakes can undermine society
Abstract
Advances in deepfake technology have led to the emergence of a new picture of how doctored material will be used in disinformation campaigns. While safeguards ensure that manipulated videos may not be such a problem at the highest levels of security and defence, lower levels – such as local elections – remain vulnerable to malign actors. At such levels, deepfakes can be distributed using social media channels to target unsuspecting victims. Current solutions only protect individuals who are prominent enough to be covered by the mainstream media, and not enough is being done by governments or social media companies to protect ordinary users from coordinated inauthentic activity online. However, with more images and videos of ourselves online than ever before, anyone can be a victim of a disinformation campaign. As deepfakes become easier to make, no one is safe – hyper-localized manipulation will create problems for democratic institutions that have not yet been fully understood.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Where high-profile disinformation is likely to be debunked, synthetic content depicting figures and officials involved in smaller-scale politics may go undetected as such content is unlikely to be widely distributed and properly scrutinized (Ascott, 2020).”
From Deepfakes, Democracy, and the Ethics of Synthetic Media: A Synthesis of the SOLARIS Project (2026) · cites this paper as Ascott, 2020
Citations
Cites
Frequency and the conference of referential validity
Hasher, L., Goldstein, D., & Toppino, T. (1977) · Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior · doi:10.1016/s0022-5371(77)80012-1 · Cited by 920
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- 2019, Misinformation and morality: Encountering fake-news headlines makes them seem less unethical to publish and share, Psychological Science, 31, 75
- 2019, This Is Not Propaganda: Adventures in the War Against Reality
- 2019, Decide, disrupt, destroy: Information systems in great power competition with China, Strategic Studies Quarterly, 13, 122
- van Manen, Hugo, Atalla, Salma, Arkhipov-Goyal, Amit and Sweijs, Tim (2019), ‘Macro implications of micro transformations’, Hague Centre for Strategic Studies, 20 August, pp. 73–91, https://hcss.nl/report/macro-implications-micro-transformations-assessment-ais-impact-contemporary-geopolitics. Accessed 5 May 2020.
- 2020, Microfake: How small-scale deepfakes can undermine society, Journal of Digital Media & Policy, 11, 215, 10.1386/jdmp_00018_1
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Deepfakes, Democracy, and the Ethics of Synthetic Media: A Synthesis of the SOLARIS Project
(2026) · University of Maribor Press · doi:10.18690/um.feri.2.2026
Metadata
- Authors
- Ascott, T.
- Affiliations
- ISNI: 0000000107468480 The Royal United Services Institute
- ORCID
- Ascott, Tom
- Venue
- Journal of Digital Media & Policy
- Publisher
- Intellect
- Published
- 2020-06-01
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 215-222
- ISSN
- 2516-3523
- 2516-3531
- Cited by
- 9
- References
- 1
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review