The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Formatting the imagination: A reflection on screenwriting as a creative practice
Abstract
In this article I foreground screenwriting as a creative writing practice, and argue that there are significant aspects of the genesis of screenplays that are not sufficiently acknowledged in the development field. In that field it is common practice that screenwriters produce formatted prose documents, predicting their screen stories in detail before the writing of a first draft is initiated. A pre-formatted approach – defined here as the Set Stage Chronology of Documents (SSCD) – has been institutionalized in European and American script culture, manifesting itself in schools, funding institutions and contract formulas. This practice implies that one specific writing method is universal and de-emphasizes such aspects of creativity as improvisation, free association and the accessing of subconscious resources – all widely assumed to be significant in creative work. Drawing upon a case study – the writing of my screenplay September during a fellowship at the Norwegian Film School – I ask how principles of improvisation can be adapted and applied to the writing of the first draft screenplay. Informed by the Russian stage director Konstantin Stanislavsky’s model for improvisation in theatre rehearsals, and the associative method practiced by screenwriter J. C. Carrière in his workshops, I suggest specific tools for ‘structured improvisation’ as used in the writing of September.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“This limitation reduces the suitability of these approaches for certain types of creative writing, particularly screenwriting, which is inherently characterized by audiovisual and dynamic storytelling [86].”
From Understanding Screenwriters' Practices, Attitudes, and Future Expectations in Human-AI Co-Creation (2025) · cites this paper as [86]
In the citing paper
“These gaps stem from its unique characteristics, including audiovisual storytelling [86], structured principles [65], and multi-stakeholder collaboration [9, 15, 99].”
From Understanding Screenwriters' Practices, Attitudes, and Future Expectations in Human-AI Co-Creation (2025) · cites this paper as [86]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Understanding Screenwriters' Practices, Attitudes, and Future Expectations in Human-AI Co-Creation
Tang, Y., Li, H., Lan, M., Ma, X., & Qu, H. (2025) · Proceedings of the 2025 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3706598.3714120 · Cited by 18
“These gaps stem from its unique characteristics, including audiovisual story-telling [86], structured principles [65], and multi-stakeholder collaboration [9, 15, 99].”
Metadata
- Authors
- Senje, S.
- Affiliations
- Westerdals Oslo School of Arts, Communication and Technology (NO)
- Corresponding author
- Senje, Siri
- Venue
- Journal of Screenwriting
- Publisher
- Intellect
- Published
- 2017-09-01
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 267-285
- ISSN
- 1759-7137 (ISSN-L)
- 1759-7145
- OpenAlex
- W2769344898
- Cited by
- 18
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2
- FWCI
- 15.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Screenwriting (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Visual Arts and Performing Arts › Artistic and Creative Research
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Visual Arts and Performing Arts › Cinema History and Criticism
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Visual Arts and Performing Arts › Cinema and Media Studies
- Keywords
- screenwriting, creative writing practice, improvisation, structured improvisation, free association, subconscious, Konstantin Stanislavsky
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Formatting the imagination: A reflection on screenwriting as a creative practice. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1386/josc.8.3.267_1
- The paper
- Senje, S. (2017). Formatting the imagination: A reflection on screenwriting as a creative practice. Journal of Screenwriting. https://doi.org/10.1386/josc.8.3.267_1