Cited by 0

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

Placvit pictvras in ecclesia esse non debere: la prohibición del C. 36 pseudoiliberritano

Vilella, Josep·2017·Veleia

Abstract

El estudio analítico-comparativo del c. 36 del repertorio pseudoiliberritano pone de manifiesto que este texto veta las representaciones pictóricas vinculadas con la veneración de los santos. Evidencia asimismo que, como los otros preceptos de la «trilogía martirial» —c. 34 y 35— contenida en esta serie, debe datarse a finales del siglo iv o a inicios del v. A partir de tal cronología y hermenéutica, resulta claro que su formulación pretende evitar las figuraciones antropomorfas que entonces empezaban a proliferar en los edificios cultuales cristianos. Inserta en la secular tradición hebraico-cristiana, la corriente «conservadora» plasmada en el c. 36 estaría sucumbiendo ante la ofensiva «idolátrica», avivada, con la complicidad de muchos eclesiásticos valedores de su función didáctica, por las masivas afluencias hacia el cristianismo, con el consiguiente auge del fenómeno martirial.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1387/veleia.18080

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Metadata

Authors
Vilella, J.
Venue
Veleia
Publisher
EHU Press
Published
2017-10-10
Issue
34
Pages
147-162
ISSN
  • 2444-3565
  • 0213-2095
Cited by
0

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Placvit pictvras in ecclesia esse non debere: la prohibición del C. 36 pseudoiliberritano. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1387/veleia.18080
The paper
Vilella, J. (2017). Placvit pictvras in ecclesia esse non debere: la prohibición del C. 36 pseudoiliberritano. Veleia. https://doi.org/10.1387/veleia.18080