The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Natural fire regime: a guide for sustainable management of the Canadian boreal forest
Open accessAbstract
The combination of certain features of fire disturbance, notably fire frequency, size and severity, may be used to characterize the disturbance regime in any region of the boreal forest. As some consequences of fire resemble the effects of industrial forest harvesting, conventional forest management is often considered as a disturbance that has effects similar to those of natural disturbances. Although the analogy between forest management and fire disturbance in boreal ecosystems has some merit, it is important to recognise that it also has its limitations. Short fire cycles generally described for boreal ecosystems do not appear to be universal; rather, important spatial and temporal variations have been observed in Canada. These variations in the fire cycle have an important influence on forest composition and structure at the landscape and regional levels. Size and severity of fires also show a large range of variability. In regions where the natural matrix of the boreal forest remains relatively intact, maintenance of this natural variability should be targeted by forest managers concerned with biodiversity conservation. Current forest management tends to reduce this variability: for example, fully regulated, even-aged management will tend to truncate the natural forest age distribution and eliminate over-mature and old-growth forests from the landscape. We suggest that the development of strategic-level forest management planning approaches and silvicultural techniques designed to maintain a spectrum of forest compositions and structures at different scales in the landscape is one avenue to maintain this variability. Although we use the boreal forest of Quebec for our examples, it is possible to apply the approach to those portions of the boreal forest where the fire regime favours the development of even-aged stands in burns.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
NUMBERS AND SIZES OF FIRES: LONG-TERM SPATIALLY EXPLICIT FIRE HISTORY IN A SWEDISH BOREAL LANDSCAPE
Niklasson, M., & Granström, A. (2000) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/0012-9658(2000)081[1484:nasofl]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 507
Cited by
Natural disturbance impacts on ecosystem services and biodiversity in temperate and boreal forests
Thom, D., & Seidl, R. (2016) · Biological Reviews · doi:10.1111/brv.12193 · Cited by 770
Conedera, M., Tinner, W., Neff, C., Meurer, M., Dickens, A. F., & Krebs, P. (2009) · Quaternary Science Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.quascirev.2008.11.005 · Cited by 573
Understory Vegetation Dynamics of North American Boreal Forests
Hart, S. A., & Chen, H. Y. H. (2006) · Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences · doi:10.1080/07352680600819286 · Cited by 435
Stand-landscape integration in natural disturbance-based management of the southern boreal forest
Harvey, B. D., Leduc, A., Gauthier, S., & Bergeron, Y. (2002) · Forest Ecology and Management · doi:10.1016/s0378-1127(01)00573-4 · Cited by 264
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Bergeron, Y., Leduc, A., Harvey, B., & Gauthier, S.
- Venue
- Silva Fennica
- Publisher
- Finnish Society of Forest Science
- Published
- 2002
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 1
- ISSN
- 0037-5330 (ISSN-L)
- 2242-4075
- OpenAlex
- W1970343840
- Cited by
- 499
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 21.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Natural fire regime: a guide for sustainable management of the Canadian boreal forest. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.14214/sf.553
- The paper
- Bergeron, Y., Leduc, A., Harvey, B., & Gauthier, S. (2002). Natural fire regime: a guide for sustainable management of the Canadian boreal forest. Silva Fennica. https://doi.org/10.14214/sf.553
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.