Cited by 91Dental Health and Care UtilizationObesity, Physical Activity, DietOral microbiology and periodontitis research

Cariogenicity of Soft Drinks, Milk and Fruit Juice in Low-Income African-American Children

Lim, Sungwoo, Sohn, Woosung, Burt, Brian A., Sandretto, Anita M., Kolker, Justine L., Marshall, Teresa A., Ismail, Amid I.·2008·The Journal of the American Dental Association

Abstract

Background The authors conducted a study to test the hypothesis that high consumption of soft drinks, relative to milk and 100 percent fruit juice, is a risk factor for dental caries in low-income African-American children in Detroit.Methods Trained dentists and interviewers examined a representative sample of 369 children, aged 3 to 5 years, in 2002-2003 and again two years later. The authors used the 2000 Block Kids Food Frequency Questionnaire (NutritionQuest, Berkeley, Calif.) to collect dietary information. They assessed caries by using the International Caries Detection and Assessment System.Results Soft drinks, 100 percent fruit juice and milk represented the sugared beverages consumed by the cohort. A cluster analysis of the relative proportion of each drink at baseline and follow-up revealed four consumption patterns. Using zero-inflated negative binomial models, the authors found that children who changed from being low consumers of soft drinks at baseline to high consumers after two years had a 1.75 times higher mean number of new decayed, missing and filled tooth surfaces compared with low consumers of soft drinks at both time points.Conclusion Children who consumed more soft drinks, relative to milk and 100 percent fruit juice, as they grew older were at a greater risk of developing dental caries.Clinical implications Health promotion programs and health care providers should emphasize to patients and caregivers the caries risk associated with consumption of soft drinks.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.14219/jada.archive.2008.0283

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 36 · Cited by 91

Authors
Lim, S., Sohn, W., Burt, B. A., Sandretto, A. M., Kolker, J. L., Marshall, T. A., & Ismail, A. I.
Affiliations
University of Michigan (US)
Corresponding author
Lim, Sungwoo
Venue
The Journal of the American Dental Association
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-07
Volume
139
Issue
7
Pages
959-967
ISSN
0002-8177 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W173870119
Cited by
91
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 6
FWCI
6.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of the American Dental Association (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research (U-54 DE14261, U54DE014261)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Periodontics › Dental Health and Care Utilization
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Periodontics › Oral microbiology and periodontitis research
Keywords
dental caries, soft drinks, fruit juice, milk, cariogenicity, low-income children, African American children, preschool children, dietary habits, caries risk factors, Detroit
MeSH terms
Animals, Beverages, Black or African American, Carbonated Beverages, Cariogenic Agents, Child, Preschool, Dental Care, Dental Caries, DMF Index, Feeding Behavior, Follow-Up Studies, Fruit, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Milk, Poverty, Tooth, Deciduous, Cohort Studies, Dietary Sucrose

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review