The DOI matches its Crossref record; 37 of the 37 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Iraqi Kurdish Pre-service Teachers and Teacher Educators’ Perceptions on Technological Pedagogical Knowledge and Professional Identity Development
Open accessAbstract
This study intended to investigate pre-service teachers' and teacher educators' perceptions of technological pedagogical knowledge and professional identity development. The research was conducted with 152 English Language Teaching (ELT) pre-service teachers and 73 teacher educators from various universities in Iraqi Kurdistan. Using a mixed-method, the data for this study was collected through semi-structured interviews as well as a Technology, Pedagogy, and Content Knowledge survey questionnaire. Thematic analysis and SPSS 24 were employed for analyzing the interview responses and survey data, respectively. From this data, both pre-service teachers and teacher educators perceived a high rate of proficiency in their pedagogical content knowledge as well as familiarity with simple traditional technologies, while they lacked some knowledge of professional technologies. Participants also mostly agreed that pedagogical technologies are effective and affect their professional identity development. However, there were a few participants who believed these technologies were not more effective for their teaching practice and professional identity development. The implications of the study are stated, and some suggestions for further studies in this regard are provided.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Empirical evidence shows that higher levels of TPACK associate with stronger PI (Golzar et al., 2023; Mohammadkarimi, 2023; Su, 2023).”
From AI teaching innovation behavior among college teachers: a structural equation modeling analysis based on the AI-TPACK framework, teaching self-efficacy, professional identity, and AI literacy (2026) · cites this paper as Mohammadkarimi, 2023
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Using thematic analysis in psychology
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006) · Qualitative Research in Psychology · doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa · Cited by 194,414
Qualitative Interviewing: The Art of Hearing Data
Brooks, F. B., Rubin, H. J., & Rubin, I. S. (1996) · Modern Language Journal · doi:10.2307/329757 · Cited by 11,129
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2013) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203720967 · Cited by 7,198
(2008) · Cited by 6,727
Interviews – Learning the Craft of Qualitative Research Interviewing
Vaivio, J. (2012) · European Accounting Review · doi:10.1080/09638180.2012.675165 · Cited by 4,558
Research Methods in Applied Linguistics
(2021) · Research methods in applied linguistics · doi:10.1075/rmal · Cited by 2,782
From digital literacy to digital competence: the teacher digital competency (TDC) framework
Falloon, G. (2020) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/s11423-020-09767-4 · Cited by 1,372
The personal and professional selves of teachers: stable and unstable identities
Day, C. W., Kington, A., Stobart, G., & Sammons, P. (2006) · British Educational Research Journal · doi:10.1080/01411920600775316 · Cited by 1,114
Technology in Language Use, Language Teaching, and Language Learning
Chun, D. M., Kern, R., & SMITH, B. K. (2016) · Modern Language Journal · doi:10.1111/modl.12302 · Cited by 655
Teacher identity discourses: negotiating personal and professional spaces
(2006) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.43-6016 · Cited by 642
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- McKenzie, J (2007) Digital nativism, digital delusions and digital deprivation, from now on. The Educational Technology Journal, 17(2), 22-31.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Bai, X., & Hsieh, T.-S. (2026) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1834827
“Empirical evidence shows that higher levels of TPACK associate with stronger PI (Golzar et al., 2023; Mohammadkarimi, 2023; Su, 2023).”
Metadata
- Authors
- Mohammadkarimi, E.
- Affiliations
- University of Raparin (IQ)
- Corresponding author
- Mohammadkarimi, Ebrahim
- Venue
- Australian Journal of Teacher Education
- Publisher
- Edith Cowan University
- Published
- 2023-01-01
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 1
- ISSN
- 0313-5373 (ISSN-L)
- 1835-517X
- OpenAlex
- W4385896401
- Cited by
- 2
- References
- 37
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2
- FWCI
- 1.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Locations
- The Australian journal of teacher education (publishedVersion)
- Australasian Journal of Paramedicine (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
- Social Sciences › Education › Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques
- Social Sciences › Education › Educational Methods and Teacher Development
- Keywords
- technological pedagogical content knowledge, professional identity formation, pre-service teachers, teacher educators, English language teaching, pedagogical technologies, teacher perceptions, Iraqi Kurdistan
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
