The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Navigating E-Learning and Blended Learning for Pre-service Teachers: Redesigning for Engagement, Access and Efficiency
Open accessAbstract
Nebulous combinations of face-to-face and online learning are increasingly common across Australian higher education contexts. This paper reports on part of a redesign project of an undergraduate education subject at a regional university. The aim of the redesign was to enhance e-learning and blended learning environments. An approach that maps the evaluation research activities to the design and development cycle of e-learning tools and learning tasks was adopted (Phillips et al., 2012). The research took a participatory format involving ongoing reflective exchange with pre-service teachers with the aim of transforming practice. The article presents the context of e-learning, blended learning and drivers of curriculum renewal in teacher education at a regional institution and discusses the phases of the redesign project which adopted an action research approach. Finally the paper discusses the implications of the redesign for informing future practice and in approaching e-learning and blended learning curriculum design.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“By placing more responsibility on the students to drive their own learning (Forbes and Khoo 2015;Regan et al. 2012), the role of the teachers in effective online environments was more about facilitation than about knowledge transfer (Chigeza and Halbert 2014).”
From COVID-19 and teacher education: a literature review of online teaching and learning practices (2020) · cites this paper as Chigeza and Halbert 2014
Citations
Cites
Handbook of Qualitative Research
Crozier, G., Denzin, N., & Lincoln, Y. (1994) · British Journal of Educational Studies · doi:10.2307/3121684 · Cited by 26,666
BLENDING WITH PURPOSE: THE MULTIMODAL MODEL
Picciano, A. G. (2009) · Online Learning · doi:10.24059/olj.v13i1.1673 · Cited by 153
Cited by
COVID-19 and teacher education: a literature review of online teaching and learning practices
Carrillo, C., & Flores, M. A. (2020) · European Journal of Teacher Education · doi:10.1080/02619768.2020.1821184 · Cited by 1,019
Metadata
- Authors
- Chigeza, P., & Halbert, K.
- Affiliations
- James Cook University (AU)
- ORCID
- Chigeza, Philemon
- Venue
- Australian Journal of Teacher Education
- Publisher
- Edith Cowan University
- Published
- 2014-01-01
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 11
- ISSN
- 0313-5373 (ISSN-L)
- 1835-517X
- OpenAlex
- W2044415477
- Cited by
- 57
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 3.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- ro.ecu.edu.au
- Locations
- The Australian journal of teacher education (publishedVersion)
- ResearchOnline at James Cook University (James Cook University) (submittedVersion)
- Australasian Journal of Paramedicine (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Online and Blended Learning
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Educational Technology and E-Learning
- Social Sciences › Education › Technology-Enhanced Education Studies
- Keywords
- online learning, blended learning, pre-service teachers, curriculum redesign, teacher professional development, participatory design, regional universities, action research
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.