Implementing the National Programme for IT: what can we learn from the Scottish experience?
Open accessAbstract
The National Programme for IT (NPfIT) promises to revolutionize the delivery of health care by enabling seamless and secure electronic exchange of clinical information within the NHS. Challenges to NPfIT highlighted in the media and academic commentary are common to such initiatives worldwide. This paper offers key messages and recommendations derived from a comparable electronic clinical communications programme in Scotland, and elsewhere, as a means to aid the implementation process.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Many studies took place with enthusiastic supporters using home-grown technologies and the observed benefits may not therefore be replicable in other contexts, or when scaled-up for routine settings.
“Many studies took place with enthusiastic supporters using home-grown technologies and the observed benefits may not therefore be replicable in other contexts, or when scaled-up for use in routine settings [105], [106], [107], [108].”
From The Impact of Telehealthcare on the Quality and Safety of Care: A Systematic Overview (2013) · cites this paper as [107]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 7 · Cited by 23
- Authors
- Pagliari, C.
- Affiliations
- University of Edinburgh (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Pagliari, Claudia
- ORCID
- Pagliari, Claudia
- Venue
- Journal of Innovation in Health Informatics
- Publisher
- Portico
- Published
- 2005-06-01
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 105-111
- ISSN
- 1475-9985 (ISSN-L)
- 2058-4555
- OpenAlex
- W2131739754
- Cited by
- 23
- References
- 7
- Citations by year
- 2018: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 2.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doaj.org
- Licence
- cc-by-sa
- Locations
- Journal of Innovation in Health Informatics (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Journal of Innovation in Health Informatics (BCS, The Chartered Institute for IT) (submittedVersion)
- Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Services Management and Policy
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Information Systems Theories and Implementation
- Keywords
- National Programme for IT, health information technology implementation, National Health Service, clinical communication, health care delivery, implementation barriers
- MeSH terms
- Diffusion of Innovation, Health Facility Administrators, Humans, Information Systems, Planning Techniques, Scotland, State Medicine, Information Management
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
