The use of information technology to enhance diabetes management in primary care: a literature review
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Evidence suggests that a more structured approach to diabetes care can lead to better health outcomes. We needed to develop an evidence-based conceptual framework for the Chronic Disease Management Network (CDM-Net) project which aims to use information technology (IT) to optimally support diabetes care in the Barwon region of Victoria, Australia. OBJECTIVE: This review aims to demonstrate the benefits of IT in supporting a systematic approach to diabetes management in general practice and to increase our understanding of perceived barriers to and facilitators to the use of IT in this context. METHODS: The literature review was based on articles extracted from relevant databases by using search terms related to type 2 diabetes and IT. Eligible papers were those based on original studies which evaluated some form of IT intervention in medical practice and were published after 1996 in the English language. Studies evaluating the use of telemedicine were excluded. FINDINGS: IT has been used to provide support to patients, enhance changes in healthcare delivery and provide clinicians with access to expertise and timely, useful data about individual patients and populations. IT use has been associated with a corresponding improvement in measures of diabetes care including HbA1c, blood pressure and lipids, and in the frequency of eye and foot exams. Important barriers to using IT in diabetes care include confidentiality concerns, inadequate funding, workforce shortages, lack of time and anxiety about change. Adequate training and integration into the usual process of care are essential facilitators to implementing IT. CONCLUSIONS: IT can be used to improve diabetes care by promoting a productive and informative interaction between the patient and the care team.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Additional workload caused by the implementation of new complex interventions hindered adoption.
“Additional workload caused by the implementation of new complex interventions was also found to hinder adoption [17, 31, 44, 54, 66, 81, 84].”
From Achieving change in primary care—causes of the evidence to practice gap: systematic reviews of reviews (2015) · cites this paper as [17]
Competencies, e.g. adequate training and good computer experience/skills, facilitated implementation.
“competencies, e.g. adequate training and good computer experience/skills were shown to facilitate implementation [16, 17, 31, 32, 34, 41, 42, 44, 54–58, 60, 67, 70, 77, 80, 81, 84–86].”
From Achieving change in primary care—causes of the evidence to practice gap: systematic reviews of reviews (2015) · cites this paper as [17]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 32 · Cited by 58
- Authors
- Adaji, A., Schattner, P., & Jones, K.
- Affiliations
- Monash University (AU)
- ORCID
- Schattner, Peter
- Venue
- Journal of Innovation in Health Informatics
- Publisher
- Portico
- Published
- 2008-11-01
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 229-237
- ISSN
- 1475-9985 (ISSN-L)
- 2058-4555
- OpenAlex
- W219468304
- Cited by
- 58
- References
- 32
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 8.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doaj.org
- Licence
- cc-by-sa
- Locations
- Journal of Innovation in Health Informatics (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Journal of Innovation in Health Informatics (BCS, The Chartered Institute for IT) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
- Keywords
- diabetes management, information technology, primary care, type 2 diabetes, chronic disease management, barriers and facilitators, HbA1c, patient-clinician interaction, general practice
- MeSH terms
- Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Humans, Information Systems, Primary Health Care, Victoria
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review