Blockchain-based user-centric records management system
Open accessAbstract
Sharing of medical records among institutions can present certain risks to patient's privacy. An exposure of personal medical records causes damage to the finance, etc. Sometimes, it could put patient's life in danger.To achieve secure data sharing between institutions, many studies use cloud storage to store medical records.However, many studies suppose that cloud service providers were trustworthy.These systems required a key establishment with the cloud service providers and all the access logs are governed by cloud service providers.Patients should ask cloud service providers to check these access logs.However, it can be forged by cloud service providers during the request process.In this paper, we propose blockchain based medical records management system for secure data sharing.In order to share securely, we use proxy re-encryption scheme.Also, we use blockchain technology to audit access logs without modification.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Extant research has focused on promulgating the major benefits of blockchain within healthcare ecosystems to promote fairness and effective decentralization.
“Extant research has also focused on promulgating the major benefits of blockchain within healthcare ecosystems to promote fairness and effective decentralization (Noh et al., 2017;Zhang et al., 2018;Zheng et al., 2019).”
From Blockchain in healthcare: A systematic literature review, synthesizing framework and future research agenda (2020) · cites this paper as Noh et al., 2017
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 19 · Cited by 22
- Authors
- Noh, S.-W., Park, Y., Sur, C., Shin, S.-U., & Rhee, K.-H.
- Affiliations
- Pukyong National University (KR)
- Busan University of Foreign Studies (KR)
- Electronics and Telecommunications Research Institute (KR)
- Venue
- International Journal of Control and Automation
- Publisher
- NADIA
- Published
- 2017-11-30
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 133-144
- ISSN
- 2005-4297 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2775240545
- Cited by
- 22
- References
- 19
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 3.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- International Journal of Control and Automation (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Ministry of Science and ICT, South Korea
- Institute for Information and Communications Technology Promotion
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Cloud Data Security Solutions
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Cryptography and Data Security
- Keywords
- blockchain, medical records management, secure data sharing, proxy re-encryption, patient privacy, cloud service provider trust
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
