How to Maximize the Effectiveness of Prompts in Assistive Technologies According to the Particular Cognitive Profile of People with Alzheimer’s Disease?
Abstract
Assistive technologies represent a potential solution to allow people with Alzheimer’s disease (AD) to remain in their home for as long as possible. They involve the use of technological devices called prompts, which aim to provide adapted cognitive assistance when needed. However, a literature review of the field revealed a predominant use of verbal prompts with little knowledge of their real effectiveness. In order to help adapting assistive technologies to the particular cognitive profile of people with AD, this paper proposes comprehensive guidelines. First, we identify the main deficits of AD that influence the effectiveness of prompts. Second, we detail which prompting strategy to use accordingly. Third, we propose an experimental protocol based on a well-known test, and new prompting software, which allows for the validation of the proposed guidelines. Finally, we present the preliminary results of a first experiment conducted in our laboratory with participants ranging from mild to moderate AD. This paper is a revised and expanded version of a paper entitled Smart Homes for People
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Older adults with dementia have executive and attentional disorders, in addition to the attentional decline observed in normal aging.
“Older adults with dementia have executive and attentional disorders [2], which come in addition to the diminution of attentional capabilities observed in normal aging [3].”
From Field evaluation with cognitively-impaired older adults of attention management in the Embodied Conversational Agent Louise (2016) · cites this paper as [2]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Wargnier, P., Carletti, G., Laurent-Corniquet, Y., Benveniste, S., Jouvelot, P., & Rigaud, A.-S. (2016) · 2016 IEEE International Conference on Serious Games and Applications for Health (SeGAH) · doi:10.1109/segah.2016.7586282 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Wargnier, P., Malaise, A., Jacquemot, J., Benveniste, S., Jouvelot, P., Pino, M., & Rigaud, A.-S. (2015) · 2015 3rd IEEE VR International Workshop on Virtual and Augmented Assistive Technology (VAAT) · doi:10.1109/vaat.2015.7155406 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
- Authors
- Lapointe, J., Bouchard, J., Verreault, A., Potvin, A., Bouchard, B., & Bouzouane, A.
- Affiliations
- Université du Québec à Chicoutimi (CA)
- Venue
- International Journal of Smart Home
- Publisher
- Global Vision Press
- Published
- 2013-09-30
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 19-38
- ISSN
- 1975-4094 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2328160964
- Cited by
- 13
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 8.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Journal of Smart Home (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
- Social Sciences › Demography › Technology Use by Older Adults
- Keywords
- Alzheimer's disease, assistive technology, prompting, verbal prompts, cognitive profile, cognitive impairment, prompting strategies, home care, home automation, cognitive support, experimental protocol
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review