Pharmacological Inventions for Alzheimer Treatment in the United States of America: A Revision Patent from 2010–2020
Open accessAbstract
Alzheimer's disease (AD) is the most common form of dementia. There is currently no cure, and the available pharmacological treatment focuses on treating the symptoms. This study aimed to analyze the pharmacological treatments for AD protected in the US Patent Office. The Matheo Patent software was used to search for patents granted in the 2010-2020 period in the USPTO database. The search strategy «Alzheimer» was used in title and abstract and the International Patent Classification (IPC) codes A61P* and A61K*. The selected patents were divided into six categories according to therapeutic target. Complementary information from scientific databases was used to determine the stage of investigation and efficacy of the patented molecules. In the analyzed period, 58 patents were granted: 10 directed to Aβ peptide metabolism and deposition, three to tau, seven to inflammation, nine to cholinergic, two to glutamatergic and 27 to other targets. More than 80.0% belong to holders from the USA, France, and Japan. The molecules Elenbecestat and LY3202626 decreased the burden of Aβ plaques without significant cognitive improvement, Donanemab is in Phase 3 clinical trial, and the FDA has designated it Breakthrough Therapy. CPC-201 and PXT864 demonstrated, in Phase 2, good tolerability and improvement of AD symptoms. Most of the inventions are focused on treating the earliest phase of AD. The most advanced treatments in their research are those focused on treating Aβ accumulation. More stu…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A phase III trial of elenbecestat in early-stage AD patients was terminated due to an unfavorable risk-benefit ratio, specifically lack of help in cognition and side effects such as nightmares, weight loss, rash, and liver damage.
“A phase III trial (NCT02956486) assessing effectiveness and safety in early-stage AD patients was terminated due to an unfavorable risk-benefit ratio. More specifically, literature446,449 indicates that the termination was due to the lack of help in cognition and the emergence of side effects such as nightmares, weight loss, rash, and liver damage.”
From Recent advances in Alzheimer's disease: Mechanisms, clinical trials and new drug development strategies. (2024) · cites this paper as [449]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 66 · Cited by 7
- Authors
- Navarro-Gómez, N., Valdes-Gonzalez, M., Garrido-Suárez, B. B., & Garrido, G.
- Affiliations
- Universidad Católica del Norte (CL)
- University of Havana (CU)
- Corresponding author
- Garrido, Gabino
- Venue
- The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer's Disease
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2023-01
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 50-68
- ISSN
- 2274-5807 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4313476161
- Cited by
- 7
- References
- 66
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1
- FWCI
- 1.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer s Disease (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Cholinesterase and Neurodegenerative Diseases
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Intellectual Property and Patents
- Keywords
- Alzheimer's disease, pharmaceutical patents, amyloid-beta, tau protein, neuroinflammation, cholinergic drugs, glutamatergic drugs, donanemab, breakthrough therapy designation, drug development
- MeSH terms
- Alzheimer Disease, France, Humans, Japan, Patents as Topic, United States
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review