The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Rebuilding Public Confidence in Educational Assessment
Open accessAbstract
Educational assessment is important. But in the twenty-first century it is easy to feel that schooling and other phases of education are shaped entirely by certain assessments, and that assessment is only about exam results. The idea that test grades can accurately describe the aims and outcomes of education is unfair and reductive. Yet it is a pervasive and persuasive discourse. This book is about such discourses - the stories we tell each other - and how they impact public trust and confidence in educational assessment. It explains the roots and nature of assessment discourses, and proposes a restructuring of the debates in order to rebuild public confidence. It aims to challenge dominant assessment discourses and demands a more nuanced, informed debate about what happens in and beyond schools, and how this influences public thinking. Questioning the status quo needs buy-in from policymakers, teachers, parents and students, and from the broader public: from journalists, you, me, our friends and our children. Using examples from international settings to explore the nature of trust in assessment discourses, Rebuilding Public Confidence in Educational Assessment shows how these discourses can be reframed so that all aspects of the assessment system - policymaking, school planning, home practice with students - can be undertaken with confidence.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The 'dominance of examinations' (Richardson, 2022, p. 22) in particular has been shown to narrow assessment menus on a global scale (see Barnes et al., 2000; Birenbaum et al., 2015; Volante et al., 2020).”
From Diversity of assessment practices and student perceptions of assessment in Finland (2025) · cites this paper as Richardson, 2022
In the citing paper
“Some culturally shared beliefs about assessment, such as the idea of exams as the 'gold standard' of assessment (Richardson, 2022), may be so deeply ingrained in our societies that they are shared largely by the wider public, including parents and policy- makers (Nieminen et al., 2021).”
From Diversity of assessment practices and student perceptions of assessment in Finland (2025) · cites this paper as Richardson, 2022
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Inclusive education in complex landscapes of stakeholders, agendas and priorities
Ydesen, C., & Daniels, H. (2024) · International Journal of Inclusive Education · doi:10.1080/13603116.2024.2368685 · Cited by 13
Student self-assessment: a meta-review of five decades of research
Nieminen, J. H., & Boud, D. J. (2025) · Assessment in Education Principles Policy and Practice · doi:10.1080/0969594x.2025.2510211 · Cited by 14
Educational assessment – trends in research, policy and practice
Ydesen, C. (2022) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-818630-5.09033-3 · Cited by 10
Ryan, A., O'Mara, D. A., & Tweed, M. (2023) · Focus on Health Professional Education A Multi-Professional Journal · doi:10.11157/fohpe.v24i2.703 · Cited by 7
Assessment literacy and critical consciousness
Correia, C. F. (2025) · Oxford Review of Education · doi:10.1080/03054985.2025.2533238 · Cited by 6
Metadata
- Authors
- Richardson, M.
- Corresponding author
- Richardson, Mary
- ORCID
- Richardson, Mary
- Venue
- UCL Press eBooks
- Publisher
- UCL Press
- Published
- 2022-05-23
- OpenAlex
- W4225156862
- Cited by
- 16
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4
- FWCI
- 5.83
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- UCL Press eBooks (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Directory of Open access Books (OAPEN Foundation) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Global Educational Policies and Reforms
- Social Sciences › Education › Educational Assessment and Improvement
- Social Sciences › Education › Educational Assessment and Pedagogy
- Keywords
- educational assessment, public trust, assessment discourse, examination results, assessment policy, school planning, home-based learning, education policy-making, public confidence
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review