Cited by 1Global Educational Policies and ReformsEducation in Diverse ContextsSchool Choice and Performance

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Delhi's Education Revolution

Open access
Anand, Kusha, Lall, Marie·2022·UCL Press eBooks

Abstract

In 2015, the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) was elected to govern Delhi promising to improve public services, including education through government schools that would be the equal of private-school provision. Media reports, along with the party’s re-election in 2020, suggest strong public confidence that AAP are delivering on that promise. But is this success reflected by experience in schools? Delhi’s Education Revolution offers a critical evaluation of the AAP’s education reforms by exploring policy and practice through the eyes of one key group: the government-school teachers tasked with making the AAP’s pledge a reality. Drawing on 110 research interviews conducted via Zoom during the Covid pandemic in the summer of 2020, teachers explain how the reforms have changed their profession and practice, and whether education really has improved for children of all backgrounds. Analysis of views about critical issues such as inclusion and the pressure of achievement targets in classrooms that often contain more than 50 students, informs their observations about the reform programme itself. The study paints a more qualified picture of success than suggested elsewhere and makes a valuable contribution to the understanding of education reforms in India, and most especially, in Delhi.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.14324/111.9781800081383

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There has been a lot of research about how the COVID-19 pandemic has widened the equity gap that already existed.

    “Lastly, there has been a lot of research about how the COVID-19 pandemic has widened the equity gap that already existed (Anand & Lall, 2022;Meyer and Wills, 2022;Minkos & Gelbar, 2021;Ruef, Willingham, & Ahearn, 2022).”

    From COVID-19 Impact on College Algebra (2024) · cites this paper as Anand & Lall, 2022

  • The equity gap has widened during the pandemic, as previous research suggests.

    “This evidence, in addition to the lower enrollment for Blacks during the pandemic, suggest that not only is there an equity gap, but it has widened as previous research suggests (Anand & Lall, 2022;Meyer & Wills, 2022;Minkos & Gelbar, 2021;Ruef et al., 2022).”

    From COVID-19 Impact on College Algebra (2024) · cites this paper as Anand & Lall, 2022

  • During the COVID-19 pandemic, private school education seemed to go virtually uninterrupted, while public schools lacked reliable technology, home internet access, and home and school support.

    “In addition, during the COVID-19 pandemic, education in private schools seemed to go virtually uninterrupted; however, in public schools, there was a lack of reliable technology, home internet access, home and school support (Anand & Lall, 2022).”

    From COVID-19 Impact on College Algebra (2024) · cites this paper as Anand & Lall, 2022

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Anand, K., & Lall, M.
Venue
UCL Press eBooks
Publisher
UCL Press
Published
2022-09-26
OpenAlex
W4297859924
Cited by
1
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
UCL Press eBooks (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Global Educational Policies and Reforms
  • Social Sciences › Education › Education in Diverse Contexts
  • Social Sciences › Education › School Choice and Performance
Keywords
educational reform, Aam Aadmi Party, public schools, teacher perceptions, Delhi, inclusive education, class size, public service delivery, education policy, teacher professional practice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review