The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Classifying and Mapping Wildfire Severity
Open accessAbstract
This study evaluates six different approaches to classifying and mapping fire severity using multi-temporal Landsat Thematic Mapper data. The six approaches tested include: two based on temporal image differencing and ratioing between pre-fire and post-fire images, two based on principal component analysis of pre- and post-fire imagery, and two based on artificial neural networks, one using just postfire imagery and the other both pre- and post-fire imagery. Our results demonstrated the potential value for any of these methods to provide quantitative fire severity maps, but one of the image differencing methods (ND4/7) provided a flexible, robust, and analytically simple approach that could be applied anywhere in the Continental U.S. Based on the results of this test, the ND4/7 was implemented operationally to classify and map fire severity over 1.2 million hectares burned in the Northern Rocky Mountains and Northern Great Plains during the 2000 fire season, as well as the 2001 fire season (Gmelin and Brewer, 2002). Approximately the same procedure was adopted in 2001 by the USDA Forest Service, Remote Sensing Applications Center to produce Burned Area Reflectance Classifications for national-level support of Burned Area Emergency Rehabilitation activities (Orlemann, 2002).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Popular Ensemble Methods: An Empirical Study
Opitz, D., & Maclin, R. (1999) · Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research · doi:10.1613/jair.614 · Cited by 2,953
Self-citation
Cited by
A Project for Monitoring Trends in Burn Severity
Eidenshink, J., Schwind, B., Brewer, K., Zhu, Z.-L., Quayle, B., & Howard, S. (2007) · Fire Ecology · doi:10.4996/fireecology.0301003 · Cited by 1,423
A review of Earth Artificial Intelligence
Sun, Z., Sandoval, L., Crystal-Ornelas, R., Mousavi, S. M., Wang, J., Lin, C., Cristea, N., Tong, D., Carande, W. H., Ma, X., et al. (2022) · Computers & Geosciences · doi:10.1016/j.cageo.2022.105034 · Cited by 271
Cansler, C. A., & McKenzie, D. (2012) · Remote Sensing · doi:10.3390/rs4020456 · Cited by 165
Metadata
- Authors
- Brewer, C. K., Winne, J. C., Redmond, R. L., Opitz, D. W., & Mangrich, M. V.
- Venue
- Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing
- Published
- 2005-11-01
- Volume
- 71
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1311-1320
- ISSN
- 0099-1112 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2126453957
- Cited by
- 196
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 8.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Classifying and Mapping Wildfire Severity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.14358/pers.71.11.1311
- The paper
- Brewer, C. K., Winne, J. C., Redmond, R. L., Opitz, D. W., & Mangrich, M. V. (2005). Classifying and Mapping Wildfire Severity. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing. https://doi.org/10.14358/pers.71.11.1311
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.