Cited by 28Satellite Image Processing and PhotogrammetryGeodetic Measurements and Engineering Structures3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage

A Theoretical Approach to Modeling the Accuracy Assessment of Digital Elevation Models

Open access
Aguilar, Fernando J., Agüera, Francisco, Aguilar, Manuel A.·2007·Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing

Abstract

In this paper, a theoretical analysis is presented of the degree of correctness to which the accuracy figures of a grid Digital Elevation Model (DEM) have been estimated, measured as Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) depending on the number of checkpoints used in the accuracy assessment process. The latter concept is sometimes referred to as the Reliability of the DEM accuracy tests. Two theoretical models have been developed for estimating the reliability of the DEM accuracy figures using the number of checkpoints and parameters related to the statistical distribution of residuals (mean, variance, skewness, and standardized kurtosis). A general case was considered in which residuals might be weakly correlated (local spatial autocorrelation) with non-zero mean and non-normal distribution. Thus, we avoided the “strong assumption” of distribution normality accepted in some of the previous works and in the majority of the current standards of positional accuracy control methods. Sampled data were collected using digital photogrammetric methods applied to large scale stereo imagery (1:5 000). In this way, seven morphologies were sampled with a 2 m by 2 m sampling interval, ranging from flat (3 percent average slope) to the highly rugged terrain of marble quarries (82 percent average slope). Two local schemes of interpolation have been employed, using Multiquadric Radial Basis Functions (MRBF) and Inverse Distance Weighted (IDW) interpolators, to generate interpolated surfaces from hi…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.14358/pers.73.12.1367

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Aguilar, F. J., Agüera, F., & Aguilar, M. A.
Venue
Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing
Published
2007-12-01
Volume
73
Issue
12
Pages
1367-1379
ISSN
0099-1112 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2113901002
Cited by
28
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
4.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Ocean Engineering › Satellite Image Processing and Photogrammetry
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Geodetic Measurements and Engineering Structures
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geology › 3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage
Keywords
root mean square error, residual distribution, non-normal residuals, spatial autocorrelation, skewness and kurtosis, multiquadric radial basis functions, inverse distance weighting, Monte Carlo simulation, terrain morphology, stereophotogrammetry

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review